Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Hazard analysis and modelling
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. DREAL Languedoc Roussillon (2009). Les digues protègent…mais peuvent romper
  2. M.W. Morris (2009). Breaching Processes: A state of the art review, In FLOODSite project, rep No T06-06-03, HR Wallingford UK.
  3. USDA – NRCS (2009). WinDamB : Quick Start Guide. Module for Fam Design and Analysis
  4. CIRIA (2013). The International Levee Handbook. Chapter 8, pp 937–942
  5. Van DammeM., Morris M.W., HassanM. (2012). WP4.4: A new approach to rapid assessment of breach driven embankment failures. Flood Risk Management Research Consortium. Research report SWP4.4.
  6. Parthéniades E. (1965). Erosion and deposition of cohesive soils. Journal of the Hydraulic Division, n°91, pp 105–139.
  7. WahlT. L., Hanson G. J., Reggazzoni P.L. (2009). Quantifying erodibility of embankment materials for the modelling of Dam breach processes. Proc. of the ASDSO Dam Safety, Hollywood, Florida, 24p.
  8. Laroche C, Alquier M. (2013). Implementation of an erosion law in TELEMAC-2D: a way to predict the characteristics of a breach? Proceedings of the XXth TELEMACMASCARET User Conference. Karlsruhe, BAW, pp 103–107.
  9. Hunt S.L., Hanson G.J., Cook K.R., Kadavy K.C. (2005). Breach widening observations from earthen embankment test. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, vol. 48(3)1115–1120. [CrossRef]
  10. Hanson G.J., Cook K.R., Hunt S.L. (2005). Physical Modeling of Overtopping Erosion and Breach Formation of Cohesive Embankments. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, vol. 48(5)1783–1794. [CrossRef]
  11. Hanson G.J. (2002). Embankment Research in the US. IMPACT Investigation of Extreme Flood. Processes & Uncertainty, Workshop at HR Wallingford, UK on 16 & 17 May 2002