Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 04022
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hazard analysis and modelling
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. European Union (2007). Directive 2007/60/EC on the assessment and management of flood risks. URL:
  2. Saint-Geours, N. et al. (2015). Ranking sources of uncertainty in flood damage modelling: A case study on the cost-benefit analysis of a flood mitigation project in the Orb Delta, France. Journal of Flood Risk Management 8(2): 161–176. [CrossRef]
  3. Environment Agency (GB): online flood maps,
  4. Falter, D. et al. (2015). Spatially coherent flood risk assessment based on long-term continuous simulation with a coupled model chain. Journal of Hydrology 524: 182–193. [CrossRef]
  5. Leblois, E. and Creutin, J. D. (2013). Space-time simulation of intermittent rainfall with prescribed advection field: Adaptation of the turning band method. Water Resources Research 49(6): 3375–3387. [CrossRef]
  6. Emmanuel, I., et al. (2015). Influence of rainfall spatial variability on rainfall-runoff modelling: Benefit of a simulation approach? Journal of Hydrology.
  7. Poulard, C., Leblois, E. and Faure, J.B. (2014). Rainfall fields simulation to improve flood hazard and flood risk assessment. EGU General Assembly 2014. EGU. Vienna. (Austria), Geophysical Research Abstracts. 16: EGU2014–16146.
  8. Poulard, C. and Leblois, E. (2009). Towards objective design of dry dams at watershed scale: how to take into account the spatial structure of the rainfall and its variability. Proceedings: hydrological extremes in small basins: 12th Biennal International Conference of the Euromediterranean Network of Experimental and Representative Basins (ERB), Krakow, Poland, 18–20 Sept.2008, IHP-VII, Technical Documents in Hydrology, No 84, UNESCO, Paris, pp 21–28. URL:
  9. Faure, J. B. (2013). An Integrated Simulation Platform - PamHyr. Modeling Software. 5: 245–252. [CrossRef]
  10. Falter, D., et al. (2013). Hydraulic model evaluation for large-scale flood risk assessments. Hydrological Processes 27(9): 1331–1340. [CrossRef]
  11. Proust, S., et al. (2009). Nonuniform flow in compound channel: A 1-D method for assessing water level and discharge distribution. Water Resources Research 45(12). [CrossRef]
  12. Schröter, K., et al. (2014). How useful are complex flood damage models? Water Resources Research 50(4): 3378–3395. [CrossRef]
  13. Schröter, K., et al. (2014). Is probability of peak discharge a suitable proxy of damage in flood risk analysis? International Conference - Analysis and Management of Changing Risks for Natural Hazards. Padua, Italy: 7
  14. Moncoulon, D. et al. (2014). Analysis of the French insurance market exposure to floods: a stochastic model combining river overflow and surface runoff. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (9): 2469–2485. URL: [CrossRef]
  15. Blanc, J. et al. (2012). Enhanced efficiency of pluvial flood risk estimation in urban areas using spatialtemporal rainfall simulations. Journal of Flood Risk Management 5(2): 143–152. [CrossRef]