Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 11006
Number of page(s) 11
Section Risk evaluation and assessment
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2000). Planning Guidance Notebook, ER 1105-2-100.
  2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2006). Risk Analysis for Flood Damage Reduction Studies, ER 1105-2-101.
  3. Hydrologic Engineering Center (2014). HEC-FDA Flood Damage Reduction Analysis, User’s Manual, 378 pages.
  4. National Research Council (2000). Risk Analysis and Uncertainty in Flood Damage Reduction Studies, National Academy Press.
  5. Dunn C. and Baker P. (2010). A Watershed Modeling Tool, HEC-WAT. ASCE Watershed Management 2010: Innovations in Watershed Management under Land Use and Climate Change, pp. 1101–1112.
  6. Dunn C., Baker P., and Fleming M. (2014). Flood Risk Management with HEC-WAT and the FRA Compute Option. ICFM6, 6th InternationalConference on Flood Management, 2014, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  7. Dunn C., and Baker P. (2012). A Nationwide Comprehensive Water Management System: Can We Get There and Why Should We Care. 16th SANCIAHS National Hydrology Symposium 2012, Pretoria, South Africa.
  8. Hydrologic Engineering Center (2008). Model Design for Flood Damage and Risk Analysis of Complex Riverine Systems, 47 pages.
  9. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1996). Risk-Based Analysis for Flood Damage Reduction Studies, EM 1110-2-1619.
  10. United States Entity, Columbia River Treaty (2013). U.S. Entity Regional Recommendation for the Future of the Columbia River Treaty after 2024.
  11. Hydrologic Engineering Center (2015). Development of the Hydrologic Loading Curve for Bluestone Dam, Project Report no. 98, 65 pages.
  12. Fleming M and Duren A. (2014). Stochastic Hydrologic Simulation for Extension of Reservoir Pool Stage Frequency Curves. ASCE World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015: Floods, Droughts, and Ecosystems, pp. 2648–2657.