Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 20013
Number of page(s) 7
Section Policy appraisal, investment planning and decision making tools
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. OPW (2004) Report of the Flood Policy Review Group (
  2. EU (2007) Directive on the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks [2007/60/EC]
  3. Saaty T. L. (1990) How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26. [CrossRef]
  4. Saaty T. L. (2003) Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85–91. [CrossRef]
  5. Central Statistics Office (2016) Irish national census data Accessed January 2016.
  6. Cardona O. D. (2006) A system of indicators for disaster risk management in the Americas. IN BIRKMANN J. (Ed.) Measuring vulnerability to hazards of natural origin: towards disaster resilient societies. Tokyo, UNU Press.
  7. Bjarnadottir S., Li Y. & Stewart M. (2011) Social vulnerability index for coastal communities at risk to hurricane hazard and a changing climate. Natural Hazards, 59, 1055–1075. [CrossRef]
  8. Kienberger S., Lang S. & Zeil P. (2009) Spatial vulnerability units - expert-based spatial modelling of socio-economic vulnerability in the Salzach catchment, Austria. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences., 9, 767–778 [CrossRef]
  9. Saaty T. L. & Vargas L. G. (1982) The Logic of Priorities: Applications in Business, Energy, Health and Transportation, Pittsburgh, PA, RWS Publications.
  10. Saaty T. L. & Kearns K. P. (1985) Analytical Planning: The Organisation of Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, RWS Publications.
  11. Freeling A. (1983) Belief and Decision Aiding. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge.
  12. Dyer J. S. (1990) Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 36, 249–258. [CrossRef]
  13. Apostolou B. & Hassell J. M. (1993) An empirical examination of the sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to departures from recommended consistency ratios. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17, 163–170. [CrossRef]
  14. Andrew T. N., Rahoo P. & Nepal T. (2005) Enhancing the selection of communication technology for rural telecommunications: An analytic hierarchy process model. International Journal of Computers, Systems and Signals, 6, 26–34.