Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 154, 2020
6th International Conference – Renewable Energy Sources (ICoRES 2019)
Article Number 07010
Number of page(s) 8
Section Modern Technology in RES Sector
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015407010
Published online 09 March 2020
  1. L. Zbaravska & S. Slobodyan. Interdisciplinary communication in teaching physics for students of agricultural universities. Central European journal for science and research, Praha, pp. 97–101 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Lyall, A. Bruce, J. Tait, L. Meagher. Interdisciplinary Research Journeys: Practical Strategies for Capturing Creativity. London: Bloomsbury (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Kaittani, V. Derri & E. Kioumourtzoglou. Interdisciplinary: a focus on physics and physical education. Sport Science, n. 9, p. 22–28 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  4. A.V. Konysheva, E.N. Ibragimova. Training of Engineers in Mathematics at University on the Basis of the Information Cybernetic Approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, v. 13, n. 8, p. 4379–4391 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. X. Cheng, & L.-Y. Wu. (2016) The affordances of teacher professional learning communities: A case study of a Chinese secondary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, v.58, pp. 54–67. [in English]. [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Ermeling & J. Yarbo. Expanding instructional horizons: A case study of teacher teamoutside expert partnership. Teachers Colleges Record, v.118(2), pp. 1–48. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  7. F. King. Teacher professional development to support teacher professional learning: Systemic factors from Irish case studies. Teacher Development, v.20(4), pp. 574–594. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Marcu. Science education: the need for an interdisciplinary approach. Oradea University, v. 14, p.53–56 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Perkin. The Rise of Professional Society: Britain since 1880. Rev. ed. L.: Routledge (2002). [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Timperley. Realizing the power of professional learning. London: McGraw-Hill Education (2011). [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Manolea. Extensions Interdisciplinary Physics. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, n. 7, p. 77–83 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Yermakov, T. Hutsol, O. Ovcharuk, I. Kolosiuk Mathematic simulation of cutting unloading from the bunker. Independent journal of management & amp; production (IJM&P). Pp. 758–777 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Zbaravska. Learning and teaching support materials in professional direction of physics сourse for students of agrarian and technical universities /Scientific achievements in enviromental and life science //Scientific monograph/ Traicon Publishing House. р. 42–55. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Zbaravska, О. Chaikovska, S. Slobodyan, O. Dumanskiy. Professional competence as a key factor in improving the quality of engineering education/ Environment technology. Resources// 12th International Scientific Conference, 20–22 june 2019, Rezekne, LATVIA. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Yermakov, K. Mudryk, T. Hutsol, K. Dziedzic, L. Mykhailova The analysis of stochastic processes in unloading the energywillow cuttings from the hopper. Environment. Technology. Resources. Rezekne, Latvia. Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Volume III. p. 249–252 (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.