Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 505, 2024
3rd International Conference on Applied Research and Engineering (ICARAE2023)
Article Number 01032
Number of page(s) 10
Section Materials Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450501032
Published online 25 March 2024
  1. A. Awasthi, K.K. Saxena, R.K. Dwivedi, An investigation on classification and characterization of bio materials and additive manufacturing techniques for bioimplants, Mater today Proc. 44 (2021) 2061–2068. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Agrawal, L. De. Tommasi, P. Lyons et al., Challenges and opportunities for improving energy efficiency in SMEs: learnings from seven European projects, Energy Efficiency. 16(17) (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D.R. Cooper, K.E. Rossie, T.G. Gutowski, The energy requirements and environmental impacts of sheet metal forming: An analysis of five forming processes, J. Mater. Process. technol. 244 (2017) 116–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Yue, M. Jayapal, X. Cheng et al., Highly dispersed ultra-small nano Sn-SnSb nanoparticles anchored on N-doped graphene sheets as high performance anode for sodium ion batteries, Appl. Surf. Sci. 512 (2020) 145686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Gupta, A. Gupta, K.K. Saxena et al., Mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete composite at varying superplasticizer dosage, Mater. today. Proc. 44 (2021) 12–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Bag, A. Panda, A.K. Sahoo, A concise review on environmentally sustainable machining conditions of hard part materials, Materials today proceedings. 62(6) (2022) 3724–3728. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Yadav, G. Beniwal, K.K. Saxena, A review on pore and porosity in tissue engineering, Mater. today. Proc. 44 (2021) 2623–2628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T.K. Gupta, P.R. Budarapu, S.R. Chappidi et al., Advances in Carbon Based Nanomaterials for Bio-Medical Applications, Curr. Med. Chem. 26 (2019) 6851–6877. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Di. Foggia, Energy-Efficient Products and Competitiveness in the Manufacturing Sector, J of open innovation: tech., Market and Complexity, 7(1) (2021) 33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Salonitis, Manufacturing Energy Efficiency and Industry 4.0, Energies. 16(5) (2023) 2268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. L.O. Soares, D.R. de Moraes, R.A.M. Boloy, Energy-Ecological Efficiency and ttW Emissions of the DFSIE Fuelled with Biofuels, Bioenergy. Res. 14 (2021) 623–633. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Shi, Y. Ye, X. Chu et al., Computation Energy Efficiency Maximization for a NOMA-Based WPtMEC Network, IEEE. InterneT. things. J. 8 (2021) 10731–10744. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Yadav, K.K. Saxena, S. Sehgal et al., Hot deformation behaviour of ti alloys: A review on physical simulation and deformation mechanisms, Proc. InsT. Mech. Eng. ParT. E.J. Process. Mech. Eng. 237 (2022) 546–570. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Yadav, P. Yamasani, S. Kumar, Experimental studies on a micro power generator using thermo-electric modules mounted on a micro-combustor, Energy. Convers. Manag. 99 (2015) 1–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Bhojak, J.K. Jain, T.S. Singhal et al., Influence of friction stir process on the MIG cladded AA 6063 to study the wear performance, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (2022) 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Singh, M.P. Singh, M.M. Alam, Taguchi and ANOVA analysis of shrinkage of Injection moulded polypropylene Component, InT. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 5(7) (2014) 750–756. [Google Scholar]
  17. R.N. Dar-Mousa, Z. Makhamreh, Analysis of the pattern of energy consumptions and its impact on urban environmental sustainability in Jordan: Amman City as a case study. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(15) (2019). [Google Scholar]
  18. H.A. Jaffery, M.F.M. Sabri, S.M. Said et al., Electrochemical corrosion behavior of Sn-0.7Cu solder alloy with the addition of bismuth and iron, J. Alloys. Compd. 810 (2019) 151925. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Bodenstein, G. Schryen, D. Neumann, Energy-aware workload management models for operation cost reduction in data centers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 222 (2012) 157–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Shrouf, Ordieres J., Miragliotta G., Smart factories in Industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the Internet of things paradigm, IEEE. InT. Conf. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag. (2014) 697–701. [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Davis, T. Edgar, J. Porter et al., Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand- dynamic performance, CompuT. Chem. Eng. 47 (2012) 145–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Gupta, K.K. Saxena, A. Bharti et al., Influence of ECAP processing temperature and number of passes on hardness and microstructure of Al-6063, Adv. Mater. Process. technol. 8 (2021) 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Chandrappa, C. Basavapoornima, C.R. Kesavulu et al., Spectral studies of Dy3+: zinc phosphate glasses for white light source emission applications: A comparative study, J. Non. CrysT. Solids. [Internet]. 583 (2022) 121466. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. T.S. Singhal, J.K. Jain, M. Kumar et al., Effect of filler wire preheating and nozzle cooling with advanced submerged arc welding process on bead geometry and microstructure, Advances in Materials and Processing technologies. 8(2) (2022) 504–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. T.S. Singhal, J.K. Jain, A quantitative and qualitative review of sustainable manufacturing, Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering: Select Proceedings of ICRAME 2020, (2021) 941–960. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. P.S.S. Kumar, K.V. Allamraju, A Review Of Natural Fiber Composites [Jute, Sisal, Kenaf], Mater. today. Proc. 18 (2019) 2556–2562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. K.M. Agarwal, R.K. Tyagi, V. Choubey et al., Mechanical behaviour of Aluminium Alloy AA6063 processed through ECAP with optimum die design parameters, Adv. Mater. Process. technol. [Internet]. 8 (2022) 1901–1915. [Google Scholar]
  28. U. Tischner, M. Hora, Sustainable electronic product design, Waste. Electr. Electron. Equip. Handb. (2012) 405–441. [Google Scholar]
  29. G. Kshitij, N. Khanna, C.V. Yildirim et al., Resource conservation and sustainable development in the metal cutting industry within the framework of the green economy concept: An overview and case study, Sustain. Mater. technol. 34 (2022) e00507. [Google Scholar]
  30. R. Atchudan, T.N.J.I. Edison, M. Shanmugam et al., Sustainable synthesis of carbon quantum dots from banana peel waste using hydrothermal process for in vivo bioimaging, Phys. E. Low- dimensional. SysT. Nanostructures. 126 (2021) 114417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. I.L. Poul Raj, S. Valanarasu, K. Hariprasad et al., Enhancement of optoelectronic parameters of Nd-doped ZnO nanowires for photodetector applications, OpT. Mater. (Amst). 109 (2020) 110396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. G. Kalpana, P.V. Kumar, S. Aljawarneh et al., Shifted Adaption Homomorphism Encryption for Mobile and Cloud Learning, CompuT. Electr. Eng. 65 (2018) 178–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Y. Dubey, P. Sharma, M.P. Singh, Optimization using genetic algorithm of GMAW parameters for Charpy impact test of 080M40 steel, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing. 3 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Kumari, P. Sonia, B. Singh et al., Optimization of surface roughness in EDM of pure magnesium (Mg) using tLBO, Mater. today. Proc. 26 (2020) 2458–2461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. N. Kumar, A. Bharti, K.K. Saxena, A re-investigation: Effect of powder metallurgy parameters on the physical and mechanical properties of aluminium matrix composites, Mater. today. Proc. 44 (2021) 2188–2193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Y. Dubey, P. Sharma, M.P. Singh, Effect of tIG welding on Al alloy, Mg alloy, and stainless steel-a review, InT. J. Mech. Eng. 7(3) (2022) 808–821. [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Awasthi, K.K. Saxena, V. Arun, Sustainability and survivability in manufacturing sector, Mod. Manuf. Process. (2020) 205–219. [Google Scholar]
  38. Y. Dubey, P. Sharma, M.P. Singh, Experimental investigation for GtAW optimization using genetic algorithm on S-1 tool steel, Materials today: Proceedings. (2023). [Google Scholar]
  39. T. Bernauer, Climate change politics, Annu. Rev. PoliT. Sci. 16 (2013) 421–448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Jamil, N. He, Z. Wei et al., A novel quantifiable approach of estimating energy consumption, carbon emissions and cost factors in manufacturing of bearing steel based on triple bottom-line approach, Sustain. Mater. technol. 36 (2023) e00593. [Google Scholar]
  41. A. Pandey, A. Awasthi, K.K. Saxena, Metallic implants with properties and latest production techniques: a review, Adv. Mater. Process. technol. (2020) 405–440. [Google Scholar]
  42. Y. Dubey, P. Sharma, H. Vasnani et al., Escalating Efficiency of Soft Water Pumping Station by Altering Centrifugal Pump of Superior Capacity: A Case Study, International Journal of Engineering 3(6) (2014) 153–157. [Google Scholar]
  43. R. Samyal, A.K. Bagha, R. Bedi et al., Predicting the effect of fiber orientations and boundary conditions on the optimal placement of PZt sensor on the composite structures, Mater. Res. Express. 8 (2021) 075302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. L. Noel, G. Zarazua de Rubens, J. Kester et al., Leveraging user-based innovation in vehicle-to- X and vehicle-to-grid adoption: A Nordic case study, J. Clean. Prod. 287 (2021) 125591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. L. Rosa, P. D’Odorico, The water-energy-food nexus of unconventional oil and gas extraction in the Vaca Muerta Play, Argentina. J. Clean. Prod. 207 (2019) 743–750. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. K.K. Saxena, S. Sonkar, V. Pancholi et al., Hot deformation behavior of Zr-2.5Nb alloy: A comparative study using different materials models, J. Alloys. Compd. 662 (2016) 94–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.