EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 676 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 676 (2025) 02012 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 676, 2025
Second Edition International Congress Geomatics in the Service of Land Use Planning (GéoSAT’25)
Article Number 02012
Number of page(s) 8
Section Digital Transformation and Advanced Geomatics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567602012
Published online 12 December 2025
  1. A. El Bakkali, H. Afilal, A. Trankil, H. Rezqi, L. Ed-Daoudy, et A. Rossi, « Study of current benthic foraminifera as environmental bioindicators in the mediterranean coasts, northwest Morocco », E3S Web Conf., vol. 502, p. 01002, 2024, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202450201002. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Schönfeld, E. Alve, E. Geslin, F. Jorissen, S. Korsun, et S. Spezzaferri, « The FOBIMO (FOraminiferal BIo-MOnitoring) initiative—Towards a standardised protocol for soft-bottom benthic foraminiferal monitoring studies », Marine Micropaleontology, vol. 94-95, p. 1-13, oct. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2012.06.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. W. Murray, « Living benthic foraminifera: biogeographical distributions and the significance of rare morphospecies », J. Micropalaeontol., vol. 32, no 1, p. 1-58, janv. 2013, doi: 10.1144/jmpaleo2012-010. [Google Scholar]
  4. F. J. Jorissen, H. C. De Stigter, et J.G.V. Widmark, « A conceptual model explaining benthic foraminiferal microhabitats », Marine Micropaleontology, vol. 26, no 1-4, p. 3-15, déc. 1995, doi: 10.1016/0377-8398(95)00047-X. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Franklin, « Species distribution models in conservation biogeography: developments and challenges », Diversity and Distributions, vol. 19, no 10, p. 1217-1223, oct. 2013, doi: 10.1111/ddi.12125. [Google Scholar]
  6. N. M. Robinson, W. A. Nelson, M. J. Costello, J. E. Sutherland, et C.J. Lundquist, « A Systematic Review of Marine-Based Species Distribution Models (SDMs) with Recommendations for Best Practice », Front. Mar. Sci., vol. 4, p. 421, déc. 2017, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00421. [Google Scholar]
  7. GBIF.org User, « Occurrence Download ». The Global Biodiversity Information Facility, p. 98816, 2025. doi: 10.15468/DL.YTTB2U. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Assis et al., « Bio- ORACLE v3.0. Pushing marine data layers to the CMIP6 Earth System Models of climate change research », Global Ecol Biogeogr, vol. 33, no 4, p. e13813, avr. 2024, doi: 10.1111/geb.13813. [Google Scholar]
  9. E. L. Pascoe et al., « Predicting the northward expansion of tropical lineage Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato ticks in the United States and its implications for medical and veterinary health », PLoS ONE, vol. 17, no 8, p. e0271683, août 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271683. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. J. Phillips et M. Dudik, « Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation », Ecography, vol. 31, no 2, p. 161-175, avr. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x. [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Ouahzizi, H. Elbouny, K. Sellam, M. Bammou, C. Alem, et A.H. Bakali, « Predicting potential distribution of Thymus atlanticus (Ball) Roussine an endemic species in Morocco using MaxEnt modeling », Ecological Frontiers, vol. 44, no 5, p. 966-971, oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecofro.2024.02.011. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. A. Swets, « Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems », Science, vol. 240, no 4857, p. 1285-1293, juin 1988, doi: 10.1126/science.3287615. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. J. Gooday, B. J. Bett, D. O. B. Jones, et H. Kitazato, « The influence of productivity on abyssal foraminiferal biodiversity », Mar Biodiv, vol. 42, no 4, p. 415-431, déc. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12526-012-0121-8. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Alve et J. Bernhard, « Vertical migratory response of benthic foraminifera to controlled oxygen concentrations in an experimental mesocosm », Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., vol. 116, p. 137-151, 1995, doi: 10.3354/meps116137. [Google Scholar]
  15. L. J. De Nooijer, T. Toyofuku, et H. Kitazato, « Foraminifera promote calcification by elevating their intracellular pH », Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 106, no 36, p. 15374-15378, sept. 2009, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904306106. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.