Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 677, 2025
The 3rd International Conference on Disaster Mitigation and Management (3rd ICDMM 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01007 | |
| Number of page(s) | 12 | |
| Section | Risk-Based Disaster Analysis for Regional Development and Spatial Planning | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567701007 | |
| Published online | 12 December 2025 | |
- B. Philibosian et al., Rupture and variable coupling behavior of the Mentawai segment of the Sunda megathrust during the supercycle culmination of 1797 to 1833. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 119(9), 7258-7287, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011200 [Google Scholar]
- S. Ardiansyah, Earthquake Potential Energy in the Mentawai-West Sumatra Segment Area. Psj. 2(1), (2014) (in Indonesian). https://www.academia.edu/download/33353674/EN ERGI_POTENSIAL_GEMPABUMI.pdf [Google Scholar]
- S.C. Singh et al., Evidence of active back thrusting at the NE Margin of Mentawai Islands, SW Sumatra. Geophys. J. Int. 180(2), 703–714, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04458.x [Google Scholar]
- F. Ashar, D. Amaratunga, and R. Haigh, The Analysis of Tsunami Vertical Shelter in Padang City. Procedia Econ. Financ. 18, 916–923, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)01018-1 [Google Scholar]
- R. Baihaqi, D. Pujiastuti, Earthquake Risk Analysis in Pariaman City, West Sumatra Province. J. Fis. Unand. 12(2), 207–213, (2023). https://doi.org/10.25077/jfu.12.2.206-212.2023 [Google Scholar]
- A. Tohari, et al., Characteristics of sandy soil liquefaction in Padang City based on the microtremor method. Has. Penelit. Puslit. 978–979. (2013) (in Indonesian). [Google Scholar]
- R. Imani and T. Wiraseptya, Designing Earthquake and Tsunami Zone Maps for Padang City Using 3D Isometric Art Techniques. J. Civ. Eng. Plan. 5(3), 170–179, (2022). https://doi.org/10.24815/jarsp.v5i3.25144 [Google Scholar]
- F. Makinoshima, Y. Oishi, and F. Imamura, Urban structure reinforces attitudes towards tsunami evacuation. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 1–10, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33562-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Mls et al., Agent-based models of human response to natural hazards: systematic review of tsunami evacuation, Nat. Hazards. 115(3), 1887–1908, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05643-x [Google Scholar]
- A. H. Algamar and F. Bahar, The Role of Mosques as Information Centers and Temporary Evacuation Sites in Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster Preparedness in Padang City. J. Disaster Management. 5(1), 47–60, (2019) (in Indonesian) https://doi.org/10.33172/JMB.V5I1.608 [Google Scholar]
- R. Lovreglio, A. Fonzone, L. dell’Olio, and D. Borri, A study of herding behaviour in exit choice during emergencies based on random utility theory. Safety Sci. 82, 1951, 421–431, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.10.015 [Google Scholar]
- C. Chen, A. Buylova, C. Chand, H. Wang, L. A. Cramer, and D.T. Cox, Households’ Intended Evacuation Transportation Behavior in Response to Earthquake and Tsunami Hazard in a Cascadia Subduction Zone City. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2674(7), (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120920873 [Google Scholar]
- N. Mahittikul et al., Examining the Factors Influencing Tsunami Evacuation Action Selection in Thailand: A Comprehensive Study Involving Local Residents, Non-Local Workers, and Travelers. Sustain. 16(5), (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052024 [Google Scholar]
- K. Shiwaku and R. Shaw, Proactive co-learning: A new paradigm in disaster education. Disaster Prev. Manag. An Int. J. 17(2), 183–198, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560810872497 [Google Scholar]
- D. Kyne, Willingness to Prepare for Disasters among Individuals with Disabilities: An Essential Component for Building Disaster Resiliency. Soc. Sci. 12(7), 422 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070422 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.