Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 707, 2026
2026 2nd International Conference on Energy Engineering and Pollution Control (EEPC 2026)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 6
Section Energy Engineering and Environmental Pollution Control
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670701007
Published online 27 April 2026
  1. International Energy Agency. CO₂ Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2024[R]. Paris: IEA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  2. IPCC. Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[R]. Geneva: IPCC, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu J, Zhang H, Li Y, et al. CO₂ utilization technologies: Current status and future perspectives[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 198: 113987. [Google Scholar]
  4. American Chemistry Council. Chemical Industry Outlook 2024[R]. Washington DC: ACC, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang L, Chen G, Zhang Y, et al. Life cycle assessment of olefin production from fossil and renewable resources[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 412: 137456. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang L, Li H, Wang J, et al. Bifunctional ZnZrOₓ/SAPO-34 catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to Low-carbon olefins[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2025, 498: 145231. [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith A, Johnson B, Williams C. Thermodynamic limits of CO₂ hydrogenation to olefins via FTS route[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2024, 63(12): 4567–4578. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang J, Ai P, Guo L, et al. Research progress of CO₂ hydrogenation to Low-carbon olefins over Fe-based catalysts[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2025, 83(6): 789–805. [Google Scholar]
  9. Riedel R, Müller T, Becker K. Kinetics of RWGS reaction over Fe-Co catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 428: 214–225. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim S, Lee J, Park H. Temperature effect on olefin/paraffin ratio in CO₂-FTS reaction[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2024, 178: 106456. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhao Y, Zhang L, Li S. Pressure dependence of CO₂ hydrogenation to olefins[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2024, 256: 107345. [Google Scholar]
  12. Riedel R, Becker K, Müller T. Five-stage kinetic model of CO₂-FTS reaction[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2024, 351: 122890. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu S, Chen L, Zhang H. Kinetic study of MTO reaction over SAPO-34[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2024, 281: 118234. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang S, Liu Y, Chen X. In-situ XPS study on Fe₅C₂ active phase[J]. Surface Science, 2024, 756: 122345. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao Huabo, Martin. χ-Fe5C2: Structure, Synthesis and Control of Catalytic Properties [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 36(1): 1906087. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu Xiaoyan, Zhao Weina, Wei Guoqiang, et al. Research Progress on Catalysts for Synthesis Gas to Produce Low-Carbon Olefins [J]. Advances in New & Renewable Energy, 2024, 12(3). [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee J, Kim S, Park H. Effect of Mn promoter on enol intermediate formation[J]. Catalysis Letters, 2024, 154(5): 1234–1245. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang Jun, Du Zhenzhen, Wang Jing, et al. Research Progress of Graphene-Loaded Metal Oxide Catalysts in Oxygen Reduction Reactions [J]. Journal of Materials Engineering/Cailiao Gongcheng, 2023, 51(7). [Google Scholar]
  19. Duan Ruizhi, Wang Xiaomei, Zhou Panwang, et al. The Role of Hydroxyl Species in the Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on Transition Metal Surfaces [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025: 100111. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang Zhengxue, Zhang Yuewen, Zhang Xiujuan, et al. Advances in Technologies for Catalytic Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Produce Chemicals [J]. Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 2024, 54(7). [Google Scholar]
  21. Bai Di. Research Progress on CO Oxidation Reaction Catalysts [J]. Advances in Material Chemistry, 2022, 10: 36. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhao L, Wang H, Liu J. In-situ Raman study on methanol synthesis from CO₂[J]. Vibrational Spectroscopy, 2024, 132: 103456. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen G, Zhang Y, Li M. Hydrocarbon pool mechanism in MTO reaction[J]. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2025, 58(3): 567–578. [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang J, Ai P, Guo L. Research progress of Fe-based catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to long-chain olefins[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2025, 31(1): 173–191. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sun J, Li M, Wang F. Research progress of CO₂ catalytic hydrogenation to olefins[J]. Clean Coal Technology, 2025, 31(9): 45–58. [Google Scholar]
  26. Davis B H. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Catalysts and chemistry[J]. Catalysis Today, 2024, 446: 114901. [Google Scholar]
  27. Li Z, Zhang L, Wang J. Deactivation mechanism of FeZn catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to olefins[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2025, 53(6): 1234–1245. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang H, Li Y, Wang Z. NaSrFe catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to olefins[J]. Catalysis Letters, 2024, 154(8): 2134–2145. [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith A, Johnson B, Williams C. Pd-promoted Fe-based catalysts for low-temperature activity[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2024, 177: 106432. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang J, Li Q, Zhang H. DFT study on CuAg catalysts for CO₂ reduction[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2025, 15(6): 4567–4578. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li Z, Zhang L, Wang J. Regeneration of deactivated Fe-based catalysts[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2025, 180: 106501. [Google Scholar]
  32. Selleby M. An assessment of the Ca-Fe-O-Si system[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 1997, 28(4): 577–596. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhao Y, Zhang S, Li H. Membrane reactor for CO₂ hydrogenation to olefins[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification, 2024, 198: 109012. [Google Scholar]
  34. International Renewable Energy Agency. Green Hydrogen Outlook 2024[R]. Abu Dhabi: IRENA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhou Shouwei, Zhu Junlong. Exploring the Paths to Support the "Carbon Peak, Carbon Neutrality" Strategy [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(12). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.