| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 125, 2019
The 4th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2019)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 16007 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Epidemiology Related to Disease and Health Event Prevention and Control | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912516007 | |
| Published online | 28 October 2019 | |
Optimization of MSCT Tracking Images on Ureters against Noise Assessment with ASIR Variations
Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang - Indonesia
* Corresponding author: nanang.sulaksono@yahoo.com
MSCT is one of the modalities to diagnose kidney function. Urinary tract examination or by using tracking reconstruction without using positive contrast media is able to produce urinary tract images and use tracking able to identify urinary tract images with urolithiasis. The need for an appropriate ASIR setting value in the MSCT plane parameters, To prove differences in image quality and identify which ASIR is best for MSCT too knowing the optimal image between using tracking and CT Urography examination using contrast. This experimental study with the PostTest Only Group Design study design, the number of samples used was 5 groups. The results of MSCT image showed that there was a significant difference in the value of < 0,001 (p <0.05) with the mean value for each ASIR as follows 20 mean value 3.40, ASIR 40 mean value 7.90, ASIR 60 mean value 12.70, ASIR 80 mean value 18.00, ASIR 100 mean value 23.00. The results of the MSCT urinary tract analysis after the ASIR test showed that there were significant differences between ASIR. Conclusion optimal image results using tracking by The mean value is ASIR 100 the rank of 23.00 and CT Urography using positive contrast media of 8.00.
Key words: MSCT / Ureter / Tracking / ASIR
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.