Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 135, 2019
Innovative Technologies in Environmental Science and Education (ITESE-2019)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01100 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Environmental Engineering | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201913501100 | |
Published online | 04 December 2019 |
Effect of feeding haylage on milk and beef quality indices
1
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Bashkir State Agrarian University”. Russian Federation, 450001, Ufa, ul. 50-letia Oktyabrya, 34
2
Federal State Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Russian Federation, 125130, Moscow, Narvskaya str., 15 A
3
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Ufa State Petroleum Technological University”, Russian Federation, 450078, Ufa, ul. Chernyshevskogo, 145.
* Corresponding author: helenr2003@mail.ru
The ’Silos’ software package was used to formulate diets for all of the animals involved in the study. Cows of the Holstein black-and-white breed were divided into three groups. They were fed grain and legume haylage conserved with the biological fermentation products ’Biosib’ and ’Silostan’. The milk samples were analysed for chemical composition and physico-chemical properties. It was found that compared to the control group the samples of milk obtained from the test groups contained more dry matter (by 0.08 % and 0.13 %), milk-solids-nonfat (by 0.04 % and 0.06 %), fat (by 0.04 % and 0.07 %), fat (by 0.01% and 0.03 %), lactose (by 0.02% and 0.03 %), energy value was larger by 0.56 kcal (0.77 %) and 0.98 kcal (1.35 %). The quality of raw meat was assessed after the control slaughter of the black-and-white bull calves aged 18 months. Before slaughter the animals were fed alfalfa haylage conserved with the biological fermentation product ’Biotrof’ at doses of 2, 4 and 6 l of the process solution per 1 ton of the grass. Compared to the control group the average meat samples obtained from the 1st-3rd test groups contained more dry matter (by 0.48-1.03 %), fat (by 0.29-0.84 %), protein (by 0.25.63 %), maturity rate was higher by 0.55-1.55 %, energy value per 1 kg of meat was higher by 155-436 kJ (2.03-5.70 %; P<0.05).
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.