Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 264, 2021
International Scientific Conference “Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering” (CONMECHYDRO - 2021)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01008 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Ecology, Hydropower Engineering and Modeling of Physical Processes | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126401008 | |
Published online | 02 June 2021 |
Models results Comparison of different approaches to turbulence for flow past a heated flat plate
1 Institute of Mechanics and Seismic Stability of Structures, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
2 Tashkent State Transport University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
* Corresponding author: malikov@mail.ru
This paper compares the results of the well-known Spalart-Allmares (SA) model and the two-fluid model for the flow around a heated flat plate. These models represent different approaches to the problem of turbulence. The SA model is a one-parameter model and a representative of the RANS models. This model is currently the most popular and is used to solve many practical problems. The advantage of this model is that its accuracy is quite good and simple for numerical implementation. Therefore, the SA model is included in almost all the codes of the software package. The two-fluid model used in this work has been developed recently [15]. In the pioneering works, it is shown that the basis for constructing this model is the possibility of representing a turbulent flow in the form of a heterogeneous mixture of two liquids. Therefore, this model is derived from the dynamics of two liquids. In these works, it is also shown that the developed two-fluid model is able to adequately describe complex anisotropic turbulences. The fundamental difference between these two models is that the SA model uses the substance transfer equation, while the two-fluid model uses the dynamics equation. To compare the two models, we compare their numerical results with the known experimental data. It is shown that the results of both models are close to each other and are in good agreement with the experimental data.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.