Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 396, 2023
The 11th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04021 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Nearly Zero Energy Buildings and Smart Energy community (Micro to Macro-scale) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339604021 | |
Published online | 16 June 2023 |
Quality and accuracy of digital twin models for the neighbourhood level building energy performance calculations
1 Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn University of Technology Tallinn, Estonia
2 FinEst Center for Smart Cities (Finest Centre), Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
3 Department of Software Science, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
* Corresponding author: ergo.pikas@taltech.ee
For scaling renovation, there is a need for assessing the energy performance of buildings at the neighborhood level. Traditional methods for assessing individual buildings are manual and time-consuming – not sufficient to enable the neighborhood level assessment of the energy performance of buildings. Instead, new methods based on existing data in national registries and building typologies are required. The aim in this article is to develop for obtaining necessary initial building geometry information for energy performance calculations from the Estonian national Building Registry (EBR), including also Digital Twin (LOD) geometric models of buildings, and the quality and accuracy of this data is assessed. Altogether 417 representative buildings were used for qualitative and quantitative analysis. A sub-sample of 41 buildings were selected for more detailed analysis and development of methods. Two methods were developed to extract and enrich initial building geometry information for energy performance calculations: (a) the method combining the EBR and building reference data; and (b) the method combining the EBR and building typology data and LOD models of apartment buildings. The estimated accuracy of the first method (a) is around 98% and the second method (b) around 94%. Both methods underestimate the actual envelope area and thermal bridge lengths.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.