Special regime “Territory of Advanced Development” in mono-profile municipal entities

¹ Department of Economics and Enterprise Management, Kyrgyz State Technical University named after I.Razzakov, 66 Ch. Aitmatov Avenue, 720044 Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
² Institute of Economics of the Ural branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 Moskovskaya St., 620014 Ekaterinburg, Russia
³ Naberezhnye Chelny Institute of Kazan Federal University, 68/19 prospekt Mira, 423812 Naberezhnye Chelny, Russia

^* Corresponding author: gulia-fag@yandex.ru

Abstract

Today, performance efficiency of the territories with a special regime of conducting entrepreneurial activities is assessed by comparing planned targets with actual indicators in terms of the number of recruited residents, new workplaces created, the resident’s actual investment. Another efficiency indicator is the ratio of public budgetary funds per one ruble’s worth of private investments. However, these indices do not gauge the need itself for the territories to be granted the special territory status. The article compares performance results during 2016–2020 registered by mono-profile municipal entities, which have acquired the status of priority development territories, with the indicators achieved by similar company cities without any special status. For pair-to-pair comparison, a selection was made of company cities in the Ural region of Russia with approximately similar population and belonging to the same category in terms of the level of the socio-economic situation. Analysis was made of such indicators as population, investments in property, plant and equipment, revenues of the local budget, wages and salaries. The results of the above comparative analysis allow us to conclude that in the short-term perspective, the key indices of special company cities and company cities without status do not differ much.