Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 477, 2024
International Conference on Smart Technologies and Applied Research (STAR'2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 00082 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447700082 | |
Published online | 16 January 2024 |
Analysis and Comparison of Accuracy in Brain Tumor using Berkeley Wavelet Transform and Robust Principal Component Analysis
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. India. Pincode: 602105.
The main objective of this study is to compare Berkeley wavelet transform (BWT) and robust principal component analysis (ROBPCA) techniques in tumor analysis to improve the accuracy of image processing. Based on the sample sizes of BWT (N=16) and ROBPCA (N=16), tumor MR pictures of various brain tumor illnesses have been gathered. Image segmentation has been finished, and textural features have been retrieved using image processing methods. The accuracy and sensitivity of the parameter are taken into consideration by both organizations when evaluating tumor detection and evaluation. The sample size for each group could be determined by maintaining the enrollment ratio at 1, the threshold alpha at 0.05, the g power at 80%, and the confidence interval at 95%. The absence of a statistically significant difference (p = 0.182) between the two groups was verified using an Independent Sample T-test. The accuracy numbers in BWT are 81.5%, while 84% is the accuracy value in ROBPCA. When it comes to brain tumor detection and analysis, ROBPCA has performed well when compared to BWT.
Key words: BWT / ROBPCA / Brain Tumor Detection / Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) / Brain Tumors / CNN / Tumor / Tumor Detection / Mortality Rate
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.