Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 581, 2024
Empowering Tomorrow: Clean Energy, Climate Action, and Responsible Production
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01034 | |
Number of page(s) | 10 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202458101034 | |
Published online | 21 October 2024 |
Sustainable Packaging Design using Life Cycle Thinking
1 Uttaranchal University, Dehradun - 248007, India
2 Department of AI&ML, Gokaraju Rangaraju Institute of Engineering and Technology, Bachupally, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, KG Reddy College of Engineering and Technology, Chilkur(Vil), Moinabad(M), Ranga Reddy(Dist), Hyderabad, 500075, Telangana, India.
4 Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura - 140417, Punjab, India
5 Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
6 Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh - 174103 India
7 Institute of Business Management, GLA University, Mathura - 281406 (U.P.), India
8 Department of computers Techniques engineering, College of technical engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq
* Corresponding author: rubypant@uumail.in
This research examines environmental impact data, sustainable packaging qualities, consumer feedback surveys, and price comparisons to draw important findings. Research focuses on “Packaging Sustainability Revolution: Life Cycle Thinking Reveals Eco-Friendly Innovations.” This research examines sustainable packaging design evolution. Life cycle analysis (LCA) showed that packaging materials had an average carbon footprint of 120 grams of CO2 per unit and a 60% recycling rate. This shows the diverse environmental impacts of packing options. A study of sustainable package design shows that individuals have preferences. The favorability of biodegradable, recyclable, and minimalist packaging increased significantly. In subjective consumer feedback surveys, Packaging A and Packaging B scored 8.3 and 8.7 total satisfaction. In contrast, Packaging C and D do well. The cost increases among models in Cost comparisons expenditures show the economic effects of sustainable design. This emphasizes the tight balance between consumer satisfaction and sustainable practices' economic sustainability. The empirical findings improve scholarly discourse on life cycle thinking in Cost comparisons by revealing the sustainability variables driving the Packaging Sustainability Revolution.
Key words: Seating Comfort / Sustainable Design / Human-Centered Cost comparisons / Environmental impact data / User Satisfaction
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.