Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 211, 2020
The 1st JESSD Symposium: International Symposium of Earth, Energy, Environmental Science and Sustainable Development 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 03013 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
Section | Resource Sustainability | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021103013 | |
Published online | 25 November 2020 |
Do students and canteen vendors think differently about food segregation?
Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: juwita@ui.ac.id
In university “X” (UX), littering is no longer a problem, but segregating waste is still not evident. Logically, students and canteen vendors are the ones who produce most of the waste. In this study, the authors want to explore whether students would think differently about handling waste compared to canteen vendors. Using the theory of planned behavior as the theoretical framework, the authors indeed found that students compared with canteen vendors had significantly different attitudes, norms, and perceived behavior control. Students have a more positive attitude towards waste segregation, but they do not perceive it as an essential norm that the canteen vendors perceive. Interestingly, canteen vendors segregate food waste, but students do not segregate. After checking it qualitatively, canteen vendors segregate their waste because they are obliged to the faculty management rules. And the reason for students’ lower performance in segregating waste is that they do not know the campus’ program of waste management. It is concluded that the lack of socialization hinders student’s pro-environmental behavior, and the waste segregating behavior from canteen vendors is affected by the existing norms and rules.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.