| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2019
The 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03009 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Disaster Mitigation & Management | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197603009 | |
| Published online | 15 January 2019 | |
Comparative analysis of disaster information website based on web usability evaluation and quality content of disaster information
1
Master Program on Planning and Management of Coastal Area and Watershed, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
2
Computer Science, Computer Science and Electronics Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
3
Environmental Geography Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: indra.agus.r@gmail.com
Disaster is one of the most important researches because every country in the world has their own disaster potential. Disaster assessment improves over time due to technological and information advancements; and it is very reliant to a long period of data record. Disaster information is already available online in various websites, and is presented in form of map, data, video and multimedia contents. Each country has different disaster information standards, the Web Usability and quality of disaster-related content. This research objective is to find good model WEBUSE and quality content both national and international disaster website. National disaster website includes: Geospatial Information Agency (Badan Informasi Geospasial/BIG), Meteorological, Climatological and Geophysical Agency (Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika/BMKG), National Disaster Management Authority (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana/BNPB); while international website includes: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and United States Geological Survey (USGS). Usability comparison method uses the WEBUSE questionnaire with 4 categories, content organization and readability, navigation and links, user interface design, and performance and effectiveness; while the disaster-related content quality is measured using scoring method, with 4 categories, the geospatial information, data quality, product, and accessibility, according to United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). The usability level analysis for all 5 websites are classified as “good”, with USGS achieving the highest score of 0.703. As for the disaster-related quality content analysis result, USGS fulfills all categories.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.