E3S Web Conf.
Volume 92, 20197th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Glasgow 2019)
|Number of page(s)||6|
|Section||Laboratory Experimental Techniques: Element Scale|
|Published online||25 June 2019|
Non-axisymmetric and/or non-elementary response of anisotropic tuff in axisymmetric, elementary triaxial test
Saitama university, 255 Shimo-Okubo Sakura Saitama, Japan
2 Yokohama National University, 79-5 Tokiwadai Hodogaya Yokohama, Japan
3 Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, 4-5-7 Konan Minato Tokyo, Japan
4 OYO corporation, 1-66-2 Miyaharacho Kita Saitama, Japan
* Corresponding author: email@example.com
Specimens of triaxial tests ordinarily response as element in the axisymmetric condition, and it is theoretically correct assumption. However, for anisotropic rocks, the axisymmetric condition is not always satisfied because incremental relationships between stresses and strains are not coaxial. In addition, such rock specimen often shows non-uniform deformation behaviors due to end frictions. As the reason, the influence of end restraints on deformation behaviors of anisotropic rocks during triaxial compression is much greater than that of isotropic one. In this study, the variations in the stress-strain relationships of anisotropic tuff due to the condition of end restraints are investigated. The results of four consolidated drained triaxial tests with measuring the strain tensor demonstrated that the axial and volumetric strains were not influenced by whether sliding mechanism and Teflon sheets are installed at the end of specimens or not; meanwhile, the shear components of the strain tensor and the inclinations of principal strain orientations are widely varied owing to the end restraints.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.