Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 94, 2019
International Symposium on Global Navigation Satellite System 2018 (ISGNSS 2018)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01007 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Positioning Technology and Applications | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199401007 | |
Published online | 08 May 2019 |
Comparison of Sea Surface Variation Derived from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and Co-tidal in Java Sea
Geomatics Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: dg.pratomo@gmail.com
Tide represents the vertical variation of sea surface. This parameter plays important rules in bathymetric survey. The conventional method to observe the sea surface variation is by using tide pole. Nowdays, a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) can be used as a means to measure the variation of sea surface as it provides high accuracy coordinates. In this research, the vertical component of GNSS was utilized to analyze the variation of sea surface. The distance between tidal stations and the survey area can be a constrain to the depth reduction because its tidal zoning. The traditional tidal zoning is a discrete model. This can be minimalized using a co-tidal chart. In this research, the vertical variation of sea surface from GNSS and co-tidal chart approachs were examined and compared to the conventional method. The comparative analysis was performed with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The maximum and minimum RMSE during 3 days period between the GNSS and conventional approach are 0.246 m and 0.051 m, respectively. Whereas, the maximum and minimum RMSE between the co-tidal chart model and the conventional approach at the same time are 0.286 m and 0.109 m.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.