Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 156, 2020
4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering & Disaster Mitigation (ICEEDM 2019)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 03002 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Seismic | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015603002 | |
Published online | 13 March 2020 |
Parametric studies on the ductility of axial loaded square reinforced concrete column made of normal-strength concrete (NSC) and high-strength steel confining rebar (HSSCR) with various ties configuration
1 Civil Engineering Department, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 60111 Surabaya, Indonesia
2 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Sydney, Australia
* Corresponding author: piscesa@ce.its.ac.id
During an earthquake, Reinforced Concrete (RC) building structures should behave in a ductile manner to prevent the structures from collapse. Therefore, the column element should have sufficient ductility to sustain an axial load at the post-peak region. Ductility of the RC column can be sufficiently provided by confinement to the RC column core. Therefore, in this paper, ductility of square RC columns made of NSC and HSSCR are analyzed using three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis (3D-NLFEA) with various ties configurations. In total, 12 specimens for each transverse steel rebar configuration were examined. The measurement used for ductility comparisons is the I10 index (AS 3600-2018) which is compared with the concept of ductility available in the literature (for example ACI 318-14). The study found that the computed minimum transverse steel rebar diameter based on ACI 318-14 showed larger diameter than the AS 3600:2018. From the 3DNLFEA analysis found that using a confining rebar higher than 700 MPa with the same volumetric ratio shows lower ductility for the Type I RC column configuration.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.