E3S Web Conf.
Volume 174, 2020Vth International Innovative Mining Symposium
|Number of page(s)||7|
|Section||Environment Saving Mining Technologies|
|Published online||18 June 2020|
Comparative Analysis of Aerial Photography with Instrumental Survey
1 T.F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University, Mezhdurechensk Branch, 652881, pr. Stroiteley, 36, Mezhdurechensk, Russia
2 T.F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University, 28, Vesennyaya st., Kemerovo, 650000, Russian Federaition
3 Department of Earth Science, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia
At present, in Kuzbass, various methods of automation of plane surveys in open mining are used. In most cases, the choice of method depends on the material base of the enterprise and the professionalism of the performers. Typically, the work on the surveying automation consists in using electronic tachometers, which reduce time and simplify field and office work. However, the use of electronic tachometers remains the human factor and does not allow solving the problem of displaying the situation throughout the open pit at one physical moment of time. Aerial photography (AP) significantly increases the performance of plane surveys and makes it possible to most fully and reliably display the information about the surface and ensure the safety of fieldwork. The article presents a comparative analysis of the accuracy of constructing a digital terrain model obtained during aerial photography by AN-2 aircraft and instrumental survey performed with electronic tachometer Leica TS 06 plus, by example of surveying a trench of section № 1 at Olzherassky open pit in the Kemerovo region. The advantages and disadvantages of AP from an airplane and prospects of using AP from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) are given.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.