Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2020
Innovative Technologies in Science and Education (ITSE-2020)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 18098 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Environmental Education | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021018098 | |
Published online | 04 December 2020 |
Qualification reference book and teacher professional standard cancellation justification
Samara National Research University, Moskovskoe shosse, 34, 443086, Samara, Russia
* Corresponding author: denisdmitriev000@gmail.com
The research is about the Russian qualification reference book and the Russian professional standard "Professional training, professional education and additional professional education teacher" comparison. The Russian professional educational standard was analyzed and main reasons of it’s cancelling were determined and described. The basis of the article is the educational society ambiguous attitude to the professional standard introduction. The Russian professional standard "Professional training, professional education and additional professional education teacher" main principles were dismantled. The main differences of the Russian qualification reference book and the Russian professional standard were given. In the process of this comparison the weak points of professional standard were determined and described. The other researchers and teaching staff attitude the Russian professional standard introduction were also reflected in this article. The professional standard launch cancellation was justified. That is why there are detected main disadvantages of the qualification reference book and these modern and actual stayed. Based on this the conclusion was made that new legal regulatory document is urgently needed. But planned professional standard was underdeveloped.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.