| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 227, 2021
Annual International Scientific Conference on Geoinformatics – GI 2021: “Supporting sustainable development by GIST”
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04005 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Geoinformatics in Geodetic Operations | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202122704005 | |
| Published online | 06 January 2021 | |
Improvement of the method for comparing subsidence of structures using the Fischer’s F-test and the Foster-Stuart test
Department of Geodesy and Cartography, Samarkand State Architectural and Civil-Engineering Institute, Lolazor 70, 140147, Samarkand city, Uzbekistan
* Corresponding author: suyunov303@inbox.ru
To improve the quality of construction and increase the durability of engineering structures under construction, complex geodetic works should be performed, including geodetic observations of deformations of structures. These observations are carried out during the construction of buildings and structures and their operation, mainly before the period of deformation stabilization. In this regard, a reliable statistical definition of deformations close to the limit is necessary, based on the data of geodetic observations. The research helps to improve the definition of deformations of structures using the Fischer’s F-test and the Foster-Stuart test, based on analysis of the measurements of horizontal and vertical monitoring of industrial structures. According to the results, the magnitude of the subsidence plays a more significant role from than its absolute value, thus the value of the deformation intensity is of primary importance in justifying observation periodicity.
Key words: deformation analysis / dispersion / Cochrane criterion / Foster-Stewart test / subsidence of structures / Fisher’s F-test
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.