Responsibility as a criterion for determining personal maturity

¹ Pedagogy department, Chirchik State Pedagogical Institute of Tashkent province, 111700, Uzbekistan
² RTRPP center, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

^* Corresponding author: abduvali.burkhonov@yandex.uz

Abstract

This study was intended testing a new psychodiagnostics tool for diagnosis in order to identify the responsibility recognized by highly qualified professionals as one of the key criteria for maturity in work, especially in agriculture sector. The methodology developed in the framework of this research was conventionally called “The main cause of the VAS situation”. The negative correlation between intropunitive attribute and situational responsibility in experiments and the inverse relationship of extrapunitive attribute to the responsibility were also evidence of the responsibility level that can be used to diagnose events, behaviors far from the time they occur. The pertinent results showed that in the impunitive attribute group, non-situational attribution was dominant with 69%, followed by situational attribution with 31%. However, in the extrapunitive attribute group, there was a very different result that was; situational attribution was dominant, accounted for 73%, whereas 27% of examinees had behavior related to situational attribution. The experiments determined the relationship between extrapunitive, impunitive attributes, and situational responsibility.