E3S Web Conf.
Volume 283, 20212021 3rd International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Urban Engineering (ICCAUE 2021)
|Number of page(s)||5|
|Section||Research on Civil Engineering and Geotechnical Hydrological Structure|
|Published online||07 July 2021|
Performance comparison of beam-column joints with different concretes
1 State Grid Zhejiang Ningbo Fenghua Electric Power Supply Company Limited, Ningbo 315599
2 School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin, 132012
*a Corresponding author: email@example.com
With the development of concrete materials, high strength concrete (HSC) and fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) are more and more used in reinforced concrete frame structures. This paper collected the test results of normal concrete (NC), HSC and reactive power concrete (RPC) beam joints. The performances of different concrete joints were compared and analyzed from two aspects of failure process and characteristics and shear deformation. The results showed that the ratio of through-crack load to shear capacity of NC joints is about 0.75-0.80, while that of RPC joints through-crack is close to shear capacity. The randomly distributed steel fibers of RPC like dispersed steel bars can effectively restrain the development of oblique cracks in the core area of joints. When the ultimate load is reached, the average shear angle of NC joints is much larger than that of RPC and steel fiber reinforced concrete joints. The small deformation of joints ensures the stiffness of RPC and steel fiber reinforced concrete joints. However, because there is no coarse aggregate in RPC, the occlusal interaction between the two sides of oblique cracks in the core area of RPC beam-column joints is obviously lower than that of NC joints.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.