Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 347, 2022
2nd International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICCEE 2022)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01008 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
Section | Infrastructure and Building Construction | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234701008 | |
Published online | 14 April 2022 |
Experimental and computational evaluation of modal identification techniques for structural damping estimation
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
* Corresponding author: mooreho@tcd.ie
The damping ratio is a key indicator of a structures susceptability to human discomfort due to dynamic loads. Computational models, wind tunnel studies and empirical data can provide estimates of the damping ratio of a structure. However, the only true way to investigate the damping ratio of a structure is through modal identification using data from field tests carried out on the full-scale finished structure. This paper investigates the efficacy of three modal identification methods for estimating the damping ratio of the first two modes of a structure from ambient data. The three methods considered are the Bayesian Fast Fourier Transform (BFFT), the Random Decrement Technique (RDT), and a hybrid of the RDT which first decomposes the ambient data into sub signals using Analytical Mode Decomposition (AMD) and is referred to as the AMD-RDT. Each method is applied to two case studies in order to investigate the accuracy of their damping estimates. The first case study is experimental and involves the excitation of a scaled model structure using a shake table; the second case study considers a computational model of a tall building under simulated wind loads. It was found that the AMD-RDT was the superior method for damping estimation, particularly for the estimation of damping ratio in the second mode, even when the modes were closely spaced. The length of time series data used and the noise within the data was seen to affect the accuracy of the three methods studied.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2022
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.