Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 368, 2023
4th African Regional Conference on Geosynthetics (GeoAfrica 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02035 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | TECHNICAL PAPERS: Stabilization | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336802035 | |
Published online | 17 February 2023 |
Safety factors comparison of landfill lining components using single & double interface shear strength results
1 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa
2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Makerere University, Kampala 7062, Uganda
* Corresponding author: sylvic001@myuct.ac.za
The design of a competent basal lining system is crucial in ensuring a long-lasting and functional engineered municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill. However, due to the inclusion of numerous geosynthetics and geomaterials forming a multi-layered lining system, there rises an uncertainty on determining the critical or weakest interface. This is exacerbated by the different properties offered by these lining materials and their inter-crossing functions in landfills. According to ASTM D5321-20 standard, the interface shear strengths used in design of bases and side-slopes of lining systems are determined through a single interface testing configuration. However, minimal research has been done to evaluate the consequences of multi-interface testing configurations on the minimum factors of safety (FoSmin). The present study was thus conducted to further investigate this phenomena while establishing the appropriateness of double interface testing configuration using large direct shear equipment. It was found that, the difference in the FoSmin was insignificant for critical interfaces observed under single and double interface testing configurations.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.