Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 396, 2023
The 11th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04018 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Nearly Zero Energy Buildings and Smart Energy community (Micro to Macro-scale) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339604018 | |
Published online | 16 June 2023 |
Comparing model predictive control and reinforcement learning for the optimal operation of building-PV-battery systems
Department of the Built Environment, National University of Singapore, Singapore
* Corresponding author: adrian.chong@nus.edu.sg
The integration of renewable energy, such as solar photovoltaics (PV), is critical to reducing carbon emissions but has exerted pressure on power grid operations. Microgrids with buildings, distributed energy resources, and energy storage systems are introduced to alleviate these issues, where optimal operation is necessary to coordinate different components on the grid. Model predictive control (MPC) and reinforcement learning (RL) have been proven capable of solving such operation problems in proof-of-concept studies. However, their applications in real-world buildings are limited by the low reproducibility and the high implementation costs. There is a lack of systematic and quantitative understanding of their strength and weakness in actual applications. Hence, this study aims to improve the scalability of optimal control solutions for smart grid operations by comparing MPC and RL regarding their requirements and control performance. We leveraged the CityLearn simulation framework to implement and compare alternative control solutions based on MPC and RL for the energy management of microgrids. In addition to the control performance of cost saving and carbon reduction, other factors such as robustness and transferability were also examined. While both methods achieved promising results, MPC had slightly better performance and could be transferred more smoothly. Given the standardized framework, MPC is more suitable in most cases for the purpose of microgrid operations. However, RL could be preferable for its quickness in making decisions if a large number of energy systems are involved.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.