| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2023
XII International Scientific and Practical Forum “Environmentally Sustainable Cities and Settlements: Problems and Solutions” (ESCP-2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 06017 | |
| Number of page(s) | 12 | |
| Section | Ecological Cycle: Renewable Heat and Electricity, Waste Water, Vegetation and Cultivation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340306017 | |
| Published online | 25 July 2023 | |
Innovative development of the Arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness
1 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Department of Corporate Governance and Innovation, Moscow, Russian Federation
2 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Situational Center for Socio-Economic Development of the Regions of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
3 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Basic Department of Financial Control Analysis and Audit of the Main Control Department of the City of Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
4 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Center for Statistics and Data Science, Moscow, Russian Federation
5 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Department of Hotel and Tourism Management, Moscow, Russian Federation
6 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Department of Entrepreneurship and Logistics, Moscow, Russian Federation
* Corresponding author: Kisselev.vm@mail.ru
This study presents a comparative analysis of innovative development, advantages and threats of the Arctic zones belonging to Russia, Norway and Sweden by rating positioning using mathematical analysis methods. In order to determine the strengths and weaknesses of Russia among its Arctic competitors a comparative analysis was carried out using the index (coefficient) of innovative development of all these research subjects. The study also included the comparison of the parameters that make up its categories (enlarged group indicators) and subcategories (single indicators included in the categories). The results of the comparative analysis showed that for most of the studied indicators included in the subcategories (‘labor productivity’, ‘foundation of new enterprises’, ‘certification’, ‘high-tech production’, etc.), Russia lags far behind Norway and Sweden. Russia’s advantages lie in such subcategories as the development of innovative links between universities and the industrial sector in R&D, trade, diversification, and scope of market. Russia also successfully competes in such subcategories as business environment formation and creation of information and communication technologies. It was noted that these areas are promising for Russia and they should be given great attention to increase the competitiveness of Russia’s Arctic.
Key words: Arctic zones / innovation development index / comparative analysis / investment attractiveness / competitiveness factors
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.