Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 05007 | |
Number of page(s) | 11 | |
Section | Smart Education University Learning Environment | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344005007 | |
Published online | 01 November 2023 |
Self-Regulated Learning Strategies on Academic Writing: Differences Between Genders
1 English Education Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2 English Education Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: jackie.murt@umy.ac.id
Six categories—motivation, method, timing, performance, physical environment, and social environment—are used to classify self-regulated learning (SRL) processes in academic writing. Due to the more difficult academic papers, they must write in English, university students may adopt SRL methods when generating academic writing. Students who are male or female may have various preferences when it comes to using SRL techniques in academic writing. The purpose of this study is to examine the aspect of SRL that English Language Education Department (ELED) students use the most frequently and to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference in the attitudes of male and female ELED students toward the usage of SRL tactics in academic writing. The research design for this study is a survey, and it uses a quantitative methodology. 112 ELED students from the 2019 batch participated in this study and answered the “The six dimensions of SRL in academic writing” questionnaire, which was adapted from Abadikhah, Aliyan, and Talebi (2018). The results showed that students implement all six aspects equally, with the social environment dimension having the highest mean (M=3.76, SD=.60) and the time dimension having the lowest mean (M=3.09, SD=.65). The t-test result is.439. This means that the significance level is less than 0.05 (2-tailed). Therefore, it may be inferred that attitudes concerning the use of SRL methods in academic writing are similar for both male and female students.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.