Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 476, 2024
The 4th Aceh International Symposium on Civil Engineering (AISCE 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01012 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447601012 | |
Published online | 17 January 2024 |
Construction Bidding Process in Aceh Province
1 Master of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
2,3 Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, 23111, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: aulia@usk.ac.id
The problem of construction bidding process, according to current regulations it is called a tender, is an issue that is integrated with the development of facilities and infrastructure in a region. The bidding process is linked to the success and failure of a development, especially in Aceh. The tender of these providers is a process of bidding the executors of a development/infrastructure which has a major impact on the speed of regional development or can be a factor inhibiting/delaying development. The purpose of this research is to analyze the causal factors that make a development successful or an obstacle to the provider bidding process in the construction of construction facilities and infrastructure in Aceh. The research method is a descriptive method by combining qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative method was carried out through observation and interviews, while the quantitative method was carried out through distributing questionnaires to respondents and then processing the data with statistics. The results showed that the first dominant factor influencing the provider bidding process at UKPBJ Aceh Province was the information system with the highest score of 32.7674. The second factor is facilities and infrastructure (X6) with a value of 24.9302, followed by the third factor is Transparency (X7) with a value of 24,7209. The winning factor for tender participants is the bidding document factor of 87.3%, the information system factor is 73.5% and the transparency factor is 84.7%. Factor affecting failure of the bidders is Bidding Documents (X4), Election Schedule (X5), Distribution of Tasks (Especially UKPBJ and Working group procurement of goods and services/Pokja Officials) (X2), Standards Used (Especially UKPBJ and Working group procurement of goods and services/Pokja Officials) (X3).
Key words: Bidding / provider / development / construction / successful
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.