Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 483, 2024
The 3rd International Seminar of Science and Technology (ISST 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 03010 | |
Number of page(s) | 15 | |
Section | Trends in Mathematics and Computer Science for Sustainable Living | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448303010 | |
Published online | 31 January 2024 |
System Usability Scale for Measuring Usability of Social Network Applications from User Perspectives
STIMIK ESQ, Information System Department, 12560, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: m.nasyiah@students.esqbs.ac.id
There are two common methods of the System Usability Scale (SUS) in quantitative usability evaluation, which are the Sauro & Lewis method and the Riihiaho method. The research aims to find the fittest SUS methods for usability evaluation of a social network application from those two methods. Using a comparative study approach, the research compared the number of valid scores of the 10 SUS indicators between those two methods. The valid score of each SUS indicator is obtained if the data of the SUS evaluation and the qualitative usability evaluation support each other. Qualitative data which was collected from five ordinary users for each SUS method by usability testing and interviews had been analyzed using a topdown analysis approach. The research obtained two main findings. Firstly, the Sauro & Lewis method is more relevant than the Riihiaho method from the comparison between the obtained SUS indicator scores and interview results. Secondly, the two methods have the same strength of relevance when the SUS indicator scores are compared with the usability testing result. Based on those findings, the Sauro & Lewis method may be fitter than the Riihiaho method for evaluating the usability of a social network application, from the user perspective.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.