Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 531, 2024
Ural Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (UESF-2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04011 | |
Number of page(s) | 14 | |
Section | Environmental Monitoring and Pollution Control | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453104011 | |
Published online | 03 June 2024 |
Empirical models of electron precipitations at the Earth’s ionosphere high latitudes: a review
1 Department of Information Technologies, Murmansk Arctic University, Lenina Ave., 57, 183038 Murmansk, Russia
2 Near-Earth Environment Computer Modelling Laboratory, Murmansk Arctic University, Egorova St., 15, 183038 Murmansk, Russia
* Corresponding author: ovz.office@gmail.com
This paper presents a review of the Earth’s ionosphere empirical models of high-latitude energetic electron precipitations. In total, the review includes twelve models. Those models represent the full spectra from the earliest to the most recently developed ones. The majority of models were derived from the DMSP mission data. Models by McDiarmid et al., Spiro et al., Zhang & Paxton, Kamp et al., and Wu et al. are the exceptions. The first two models were developed before the DMSP mission era. Most of considered models are based on a physical representation of precipitating electron fluxes. However, some models are utilizing the purely “technician” approach. Those models are constructed for each channel of the DMSP/SSJ4 detector separately. Nowadays, AFGL, Ovation Prime (OP), and OP-2013 are the most popular models. The AFGL model is the first one with reasonable accuracy being available for public use. However, OP/OP-2013 models are becoming more popular now. They provide the finer specification of the electron precipitations over the AFGL model but require the solar wind in situ observations as the input parameter.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.