Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 631, 2025
6th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization and Applications (MDOA 2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01002 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
Section | Prediction and Optimization for Advance Proceeding and Health Monitoring | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202563101002 | |
Published online | 26 May 2025 |
Study on Optimal Conventional Triaxial Strength Criterion of Rock Based on Gauss-Newton Method
School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China
a) Corresponding author: guobaohua@139.com;
b) 15222314016@163.com;
c) zhe991027@163.com;
d) 19103948962@163.com;
e) zhongpb04@163.com;
Conventional triaxial strength criteria are used widely to judge the rock failure states. In this paper, the nonlinear least squares method (Guass-newton method) is used to fit the regression relationships between the maximum principal stress σ1 as well as the differential stress σ1-σ3 and the minimum principal stress σ3 by the linear, parabolic, power, logarithmic, hyperbolic and exponential equations in the principal stress space by using 1stOpt software. Results show that the linear equation has a poor fitting effect (low R2), while power, logarithmic, hyperbolic, and exponential equations perform better. Nonlinear equations can approximate test uniaxial compressive strength values, and using (σt)t improves regression accuracy. In conclusion, different equations are recommended based on (σt)t inclusion. The power equation is good when (σt)t is excluded, and power, logarithmic, exponential, and hyperbolic equations are suitable when (σt)t is included. For regression tensile strength (σt)r, power equation fitting is closest to the test value without (σt)t, and all nonlinear equations work well with (σt)t. These four nonlinear equations are ideal for fitting triaxial failure envelopes due to high R², guiding rock engineering. The conclusions are of some significance to use the conventional triaxial strength criterion in geotechnical engineering.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.