| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 668, 2025
2025 International Conference on Structural and Civil Engineering (ICSCE 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Behavior of Geomaterials and Soil-Structure Systems under Complex Environmental Conditions | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566801001 | |
| Published online | 27 November 2025 | |
Evaluation for Ultimate Horizontal Load Capacity and Subsurface Hinge Depth in Sand-RC Pile Foundation Systems
1 Graduate Student, Department of Arch., Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
2 Assoc. Prof., Department of Arch., Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
* Corresponding author: 24wm3138@student.gs.chiba-u.jp
This study verified the accuracy of a simplified estimation method for the ultimate horizontal load capacity of soil-RC pile foundation interaction systems by comparing it with a numerical model that simulates nonlinear behavior of the ground and pile members. The analysis considered various pile diameters (0.5 m, 1.0 m, 1.5 m, 2.0 m) and ground relative densities (30%, 60%, 90%). In the model, the pile bottom was fixed, and the head was constrained to rotation only. A pushover analysis was performed until the pile exhibited a two-hinge bending failure. Comparison with Broms’s evaluation method revealed that the ratio of the numerical analysis results to the simplified estimates increased as pile diameter decreased and ground density increased. For smaller pile diameters (0.5 m and 1.0 m), the ratio ranged from 1.0 to 1.5, whereas for larger diameters (1.5 m and 2.0 m), it ranged from 0.9 to 1.2. Furthermore, when the relative density of the soil was 30%, the simplified estimation results significantly underestimated the ultimate horizontal capacity compared to the numerical results.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

