| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 672, 2025
The 17th ROOMVENT Conference (ROOMVENT 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03025 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Ventilation & Energy Efficiency: Humidity | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567203025 | |
| Published online | 05 December 2025 | |
Life cycle assessment and comparison of an evaporative cooling system and a conventional vapour-compression cooling system for an office building in Denmark
1 Aalborg University, Department of the Built Environment, Thomas Manns Vej 23, 9220 Aalborg Øst, Denmark
2 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Groene Loper 6, Vertigo, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
* Corresponding author: hj@build.aau.dk
Rising temperatures from climate change are increasing the demand for global cooling in buildings, which is also true for northern countries like Denmark. Currently, mechanical cooling is mainly provided by vapour-compression systems operating with refrigerants that present sustainability issues. Evaporative cooling technology could be a promising alternative to the latter. A combined direct/indirect evaporative cooling and ventilation system has been developed, implemented and tested in a pilot project for an office building in Denmark. The heat source for the indirect evaporative process is the local district heating network. This presents a key advantage by diverting the cooling load from the electrical grid onto the thermal network. Indeed, the latter is a low-grade energy source, especially during the cooling periods when solar collectors and industrial heat surplus can cover most of the heat demand, and the thermal network is only used for domestic/sanitary hot water production in buildings. To quantify the environmental benefits of this evaporative cooling system, a comparative life cycle assessment is performed with a conventional vapour-compression cooling system implemented in the same building case. The results show that the evaporative cooling system has a global warming potential score [kgCO2eq] 24% to 40% better than the conventional system, with an improvement of 60%-71% and 5%-12% for embodied impacts (raw materials, manufacturing, transportation, maintenance and end-of-life disposal) and operational impacts (electricity, heat and water use, respectively. These results are a good motivation for fostering the development and optimisation of evaporative cooling systems in countries with cold climates.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

