| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 680, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Energy and Green Computing (ICEGC’2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 00048 | |
| Number of page(s) | 14 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000048 | |
| Published online | 19 December 2025 | |
Comparison of metaheuristics for the problem of electric vehicle optimal charging and discharging in a smart parking lot
1 Royal Military College of Canada, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 13 General Crerar Crescent, Kingston, Ontario, K7K 7B4, Canada
2 École Normale Supérieure de l’Enseignement Technique Mohammedia (ENSET), Université Hassan II de Casablanca, Bd Hassan II, BP 159, Mohammadia, Morocco
* Corresponding author: vincent.roberge@rmc.ca
This paper presents a metaheuristic-based approach to the problem of charging, discharging, and scheduling for electric vehicles (EVs) in a smart parking lot. EVs are becoming more and more popular and create a significant load on the power grid. With variable electricity rates, it is possible to control and optimize the charging and discharging of EVs in order to minimize the burden on the grid and the overall cost. This paper proposes a new solution encoding and fitness function to be used with metaheuristics for this problem. It compares the efficiency of seven metaheuristics, namely the genetic algorithm (GA), the particle swarm optimization (PSO), the grey wolf optimizer (GWO), the Coyote Optimization Algorithm (COA), the Equilibrium Optimizer (EO), the War Strategy Optimization (WSO), and the Competition of tribes and cooperation of members algorithm (CTCM). Results show that the best metaheuristic for the problem is not the most recent one but the GA, which is the oldest of the algorithms used in the comparison.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

