Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conferences
Volume 1, 2013
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment
Article Number 27006
Number of page(s) 4
Section GMOS II (Global Mercury Observation System)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20130127006
Published online 23 April 2013
  1. Bieser, J., Aulinger, A., Matthias, V., Quante, M., Builtjes, P., 2011. SMOKE for Europe – adaption, modification and evaluation of a comprehensive emission model for Europe. GeoSci. Model Dev. 4, 1–22 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bullock, O.R., Jr. and Brehme, K.A., 2002. Atmospheric Atmospheric mercury simulation using the CMAQ model: formulation description and analysis of wet deposition results. Atmos. Environ. 36, 2135–2146 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Byun D., Ching J.K.S., 1999. Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality Modelling System. EPA report, EPA/600/R-99/030. Office of Res. and Developm, Washington, DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  4. Byun, D.W. and Schere, K.L., 2006. Review of the governing governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59(2), 51–77 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gery, M.W., Whitten, G.Z., Killus, J.P., Dodge, M.C., 1989. A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 12925–12956. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grell, G., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D.R., 1995. A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note 398, NCAR, Boulder, Colorado, USA. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jung, G., Hedgeckock, I.M., Pirrone, N., 2009.ECHMERIT V1.0 – a new global fully coupled mercurychemistry and transport model. Geosci. Model Dev. 2, 175–195 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pacyna, E., Pacyna, J., Sundseth, K., Munthe, J., Kindbom, K., Wilson, S., Steenhuisen, F., Maxson, P., 2010. Global emission of mecury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmos. Environ. 4, 2487–2499 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rockel, B., Will, A. and Hense, A. (2008): The regional climate model COSMO-CLM (CCLM), Meteorol. Z., 17, 347–248 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schättler, U., Doms, G., Schraff, C., 2008. A description of the nonhydrostatic regional COSMO-Model. Part I: Dynamics and numerics. Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, 2008 [available from http://www.cosmo-model.org]. [Google Scholar]
  11. Skamarock, W.C., Klemp, J.B., 2008. A Time-Split Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Model for Weather Research and Forecasting Applications. J. Comp. Phys. 227, 3465–3485. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.