Open Access
E3S Web of Conferences
Volume 1, 2013
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment
Article Number 41038
Number of page(s) 4
Section Addendum
Published online 22 July 2014
  1. Abreu S. N., E. Pereira, C. Vale, & A. C. Duarte, 2000. Accumulation of mercury in sea bass from a contaminated lagoon (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40(4), 293–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Afonso C., H. M. Lourenço, A. Dias, M. L. Nunes, and M. Castro. 2007. Contaminant metals in black scabbard fish (Aphanopus carbo) caught off Madeira and the Azores. Food Chemistry 101:120–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Agusa T., T. Kunito, H. Iwata, I. Monirith, C. Chamnan, T. S. Tana, A. Subramanian, and S. Tanabe. 2007. Mercury in hair and blood from residents of Phnom Penh (Cambodia) and possible effect on serum hormone levels. Chemosphere 68:590–596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Agusa T., T. Kunito, H. Iwata, I. Monirith, T. S. Tana, A. Subramanian, and S. Tanabe. 2005. Mercury contamination in human hair and fish from Cambodia: levels, specific accumulation and risk assessment. Environmental Pollution 134:79–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Al-Majed N. B. and M. R. Preston. 2000. Factors influencing the total mercury and methyl mercury in the hair of the fishermen of Kuwait. Environmental Pollution 109:239–250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amaral A., V. Rodrigues, J. Oliveira, C. Pinto, V. Carneiro, R. Sanbento, R. Cunha, and A. Rodrigues. 2006. Chronic exposure to volcanic environments and cancer incidence in the Azores, Portugal. Science of The Total Environment 367:123–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amaral A. F. S., M. Arruda, S. Cabral, and A. S. Rodrigues. 2008. Essential and non-essential trace metals in scalp hair of men chronically exposed to volcanogenic metals in the Azores, Portugal. Environment International 34:1104–1108. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andersen J. L. and M. H. Depledge. 1997. A survey of total mercury and methylmercury in edible fish and invertebrates from Azorean waters. Marine Environmental Research 44:331–350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cizdziel J. V. and S. Gerstenberger. 2004. Determination of total mercury in human hair and animal fur by combustion atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta 64:918–921. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Díez S., P. Montuori, A. Pagano, P. Sarnacchiaro, J. M. Bayona, and M. Triassi. 2008. Hair mercury levels in an urban population from southern Italy: Fish consumption as a determinant of exposure. Environment International 34:162–167. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dolbec J., D. Mergler, F. Larribe, M. Roulet, J. Lebel, and M. Lucotte. 2001. Sequential analysis of hair mercury levels in relation to fish diet of an Amazonian population, Brazil. Science of The Total Environment 271:87–97. [Google Scholar]
  12. Freire C., R. Ramos, M.-J. Lopez-Espinosa, S. Díez, J. Vioque, F. Ballester, and M.-F. Fernández. 2010. Hair mercury levels, fish consumption, and cognitive development in preschool children from Granada, Spain. Environmental Research 110:96–104. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hajeb P., J. Selamat, A. Ismail, F. Bakar, J. Bakar, and H. Lioe. 2008. Hair mercury level of coastal communities in Malaysia: a linkage with fish consumption. European Food Research and Technology 227:1349–1355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harmelin-Vivien M., D. Cossa, S. Crochet, D. Bănaru, Y. Letourneur, and C. Mellon-Duval. 2009. Difference of mercury bioaccumulation in red mullets from the north-western Mediterranean and Black seas. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58:679–685. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Holsbeek L., H. K. Das, and C. R. Joiris. 1996. Mercury in human hair and relation to fish consumption in Bangladesh. Science of The Total Environment 186:181–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Olivero J., B. Johnson, and E. Arguello. 2002. Human exposure to mercury in San Jorge river basin, Colombia (South America). Science of The Total Environment 289:41–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Palma C., A. I. Lillebo, M. Valenca, E. Pereira, M. P. Abreu, and A. C. Duarte. 2009. Mercury in sediments of the Azores deep sea platform and on sea mounts south of the archipelago–assessment of background concentrations. Mar Pollut Bull 58:1583–1587. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pereira M.E., Lillebø A. I., Pato P., Válega M., Coelho J. P., Lopes C.B., Rodrigues S., Cachada A., Otero M., Pardal M. A., Duarte A. C., 2009. Mercury pollution in Ria de Aveiro (Portugal): a review of the system assessment. Environ Monit Assess, 155:39–49. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Raimundo J., C. Vale, J. Canário, V. Branco, and I. Moura. 2010. Relations between mercury, methyl-mercury and selenium in tissues of Octopus vulgaris from the Portuguese Coast. Environmental Pollution 158:2094–2100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Saeki K., M. Fujimoto, D. Kolinjim, and R. Tatsukawa. 1996. Mercury concentrations in hair from populations in Wau-Bulolo area, Papua New Guinea. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 30:412–417. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. USEPA. 1997. Mercury Study Report to Congress IV. An Assessment of Exposure to Mercury in the United States. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vladimír B. 1995. Use of human hair as a biomarker in the assessment of exposure to pollutants in occupational and environmental settings. Toxicology 101:29–39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yasutake A., M. Matsumoto, M. Yamaguchi, and N. Hachiya. 2003. Current hair mercury levels in Japanese: survey in five districts. Tohoku J Exp Med 199:161–169. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.