Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conferences
Volume 2, 2014
Science and the Future
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 18
Section Human Societies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20140203005
Published online 26 March 2014
  1. R. Capello, A. Hoffmann, a cura di, Sviluppo urbano e sviluppo rurale tra globalizzazione e sostenibilità, Associazione Italiana di Scienze Regionali, Franco Angeli, Milano (1998).
  2. Clayton, D., & Sadler, B. (2005). Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Plans and Programmes, Earthscan, London
  3. Council of Europe (COE). (2000). European Landscape Convention (ELC). Council of Europe, Strasbourg
  4. Davico L.,(2004), Sviluppo Sostenibile. Le dimensioni sociali, Carocci, Roma.
  5. Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development. (2001). Handbook on Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework. Guidance document, pp. 9–10
  6. European Commission (2001) Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on Strategic Environmental Assessment. June 27, 2001
  7. European Commission. (2005). Council Regulation on Support for Rural Development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) n. 1698/2005
  8. European Environmental Agency (EEA). (2006). Urban Sprawl in Europe – The Ignored Challenge. EEA Report n. 10/2006
  9. Grangetti E. (2006), Analisi delle trasformazioni urbane in Piemonte nel decennio 1991-2001 mediante l’uso di tecniche GIS (Geographic Information System), Master Universitario Europeo del Politecnico di Torino in “Tecniche per la progettazione e la valutazione ambientale”, Torino.
  10. Guidicini P. (1986), Il rurale riemergente. Un percorso storico su ipotesi di razionalità nell’agricolo e nella non città, Franco Angeli, Milano.
  11. Hoffmann A.(2006), La Nuova Politica di Sviluppo Rurale, Franco Angeli, Milano.
  12. Ingersoll R. (2004), Sprawltown. Cercando la città in periferia, Meltemi, Roma.
  13. Paolillo P.L., (2002), a cura di, Problematiche del parametro suolo. Uno sguardo preoccupato alla situazione regionale, Franco Angeli, Milano.
  14. Partidàrio M.R., Clark R. (2000), Perspective on Strategic Environmental Assessment, Lewis Publishers, USA.
  15. Sadler B., Verheem (1996), Strategic Environmental Assessment 53: Status, Challenges and Future Directions, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, The Netherlands, and the International Study of Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment.
  16. Sadler B., Dalal-Clayton (2005), Strategic Environmental Assessment. A sourcebook and reference guide to international experience, Earthscan, London.
  17. Schmidt M., Joao E., Albrecht E., (2006, II edition), Implementing strategic environmental assessment, Springer
  18. Thérivel R. e Partidario M. R. (1996), The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment, Earthscan, London.
  19. Thérivel R., Wilson E., Thompson S., Heaney D., Pritchard D. (1992), Strategic Environmental Assessment, Earthscan, London.
  20. Journal and book articles: Antrop, M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanisation process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67: 9–26. [CrossRef]
  21. Di Iacovo F. (2004), “Welfare rigenerativo e nuove forme di dialogo nel rurbano toscano”, Rivista di Economia Agraria, vol IV, pp. 164–185.
  22. Fischer T.B., Seaton K. (2002), Strategic Environmental Assessment: Effective Planning Instrument or Lost Concept?, in Planning Practice and Research, Abingdon e Cambridge (Ma.), 2002, 1, p. 31–44.
  23. Jha-Thakur, U., Gazzola, P., Peel, D., Fischer, T. B., & Kidd, S. (2009). Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment – The significance of learning. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 27, pp. 133–144 [CrossRef]
  24. Geist, H.J. et al. (2006), “Causes and Trajectories of Land-Use/Cover Change”, In: E.F. Lambin and H. J. Geist (Editor), Land-Use and Land-Cover Change. Local Processes and Global Impacts, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York,42–70.
  25. Glasson J., Gosling J. (2001), SEA and regional planning – overcoming the institutional constraints: some lessons from the EU, European Environment n° 11, 2001, 2, p.89–102. [CrossRef]
  26. Hersperger, A.M. and Bürgi, M., (2007), “Driving forces of landscape change in the urbanizing limmat valley, Switzerland”, In E. Koomen, J. Stillwell, A. Bakema and H.J. Scholten (Editors), Modelling Land-Use Change Progress and application, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  27. Lambin, E.F., Geist, H.J. and Lepers, E. (2003), Dynamics of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Tropical Regions. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 28: 205.241. [CrossRef]
  28. Spaziante A., Murano C. (2009), “Rural Development Programs and Strategic Environmental Assessment: towards a Sustainable Rural Territory” in International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Vol. 8, Ns 2/3/4 pag 205 – 222 [CrossRef]
  29. Spaziante A., Murano C. (2009), “La VAS nei Psr 2007-2013. Etica ed estetica nella tutela dell’ambiente e del paesaggio”, in Moccia F.D., I valori in urbanistica fra etica ed estetica, Roma, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2009.
  30. Spaziante A., Cassatella C., Murano C., Carbone M. (2009), “Consumo di suolo, consumo di paesaggio? Prospettive di ricerca sulla misura delle ricadute dei Programmi di Sviluppo Rurale”, Valutazione Ambientale, n. 16, luglio-dicembre 2009, pp.12–17.
  31. Spaziante A., Murano C. (2008), “La VAS nei Programmi di Sviluppo Rurale: snodi critici del doppio processo di programmazione / valutazione nei PSR 2007 – 2013 delle Regioni Piemonte e Valle d’Aosta”, in L. Colombo, S. Losco, C. Pacella (editors) La valutazione ambientale nei piani e nei progetti, Ed. Le Penseur, Brienza (Potenza), maggio 2008, pagg. 291 – 300
  32. Thérivel R., Walsh F. (2006), The Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive in the UK: 1 Year Onwards, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 26 pp. 663–675. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.