Open Access
E3S Web of Conferences
Volume 2, 2014
Science and the Future
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 5
Section A desirable future
Published online 26 March 2014
  1. J. Campbell, Le distese interiori del cosmo. TEA (2003) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Dupré, The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science, Harvard University Press (1993) [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Kellert with Helen Longino, and C. Kenneth Waters (eds.), Scientific Pluralism (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XIX), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (2006) [Google Scholar]
  4. URL: [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Biermann et al. Science 335,1306–7 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Steffen et al. Ambio 40 (7), 739–761 (2011) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. D. Barnosky et al. Nature 486, 52–58 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. R. Ehrlich, A. H. Ehrlich, Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20122845 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Folke and L. Gunderson Ecology and Society 17(4), 55 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  10. J.H. Matthews, F. Boltz, PLoS Biol 10 (2012). URL: [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Benessia, S. Funtowicz. in L’innovazione tra utopia e storia, 55–121, Codice (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Strand, K. Rommetveit, S. Funtowicz, Deliverable 5.4.2, Seventh framework Programme, Capacities Work Programme: Part 5 – Science in Society (2011). [Google Scholar]
  13. M.A.K. Halliday, Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, London, Edward Arnold (1978) [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Sarewitz, Environmental science and policy 7, 385–403 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. R. Ravetz, Futures, 43, 142–148 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosphicus. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul (1974) [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Latour, A Plea for Earthly Sciences, keynote lecture for the annual meeting of the British Sociological Association, East London (2007) [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Ravetz, The No-Nonsense Guide to Science. Between the Lines (2005) [Google Scholar]
  19. Royal Academy of Engineering, Synthetic biology: scope, applications and implications. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering (2009). [online] URL: [Google Scholar]
  20. P.E. Purnick, R. Weiss, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10, 410–422 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  21. I. Hellsten & B. Nerlich, New Genetics and Society, 30 (4), 375–397 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Nerlich & R. Jaspal, Metaphor and Symbol, 27 (2), 131–147 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. I. Fung, Science 341, 1075–1076 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. R.L. Sriver, PNAS, 110(38), 15173–15174 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. C. D. Thomas, Nature 502, 7 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. T.R. Gregory, Molecules and macroevolution. A Gouldian view of the genome. In Stephen Gould: the scientific legacy, Springer, 53 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Rockström et al. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Rawort, URL: [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Latour, Waiting for Gaia. Composing the common world through arts and politics, A lecture at the French Institute, London (2011) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.