Open Access
E3S Web of Conferences
Volume 5, 2015
2nd Symposium on OpenFOAM® in Wind Energy
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 10
Section Atmospheric Flow
Published online 16 October 2015
  1. P.R. Spalart et al., Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings, and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach, in Proceedings of the first AFOSR international conference on DNS/LES (Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  2. N.V. Nikitin, F. Nicoud, B. Wasistho, K.D. Squires, P.R. Spalart, Physics of Fluids 12, 1629 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M.S. Gritskevich, A.V. Garbaruk, J. Schütze, F.R. Menter, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 88, 431 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Menter, M. Kuntz, R. Langtry, Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer 4 4, 625 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Richards, R. Hoxey, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 46 & 47, 145 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  6. V.C. Patel, J.Y. Yoon, Journal of Fluid Engineering 117, 234 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Porté-Agel, C. Meneveau, M.B. Parlange, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 415, 261 (2000) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Bechmann, Ph.D. thesis, Risø National Laboratory. Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark (2006), risø-PhD-28(EN) [Google Scholar]
  9. L.E. Boudreault, M. Ing thesis, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montreal, QC. Canada (2011) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Travin, M.L. Shur, M. Strelets, P. Spalart, Physical and numerical upgrades in the detached-eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows., in Advances in LES of Complex Flows Conference Proceedings (KluwerAcademic Publishers, Printed in the Netherlands, 2002), pp. 239–254 [Google Scholar]
  11. M.L. Shur, P. Spalart, M.K. Strelets, A.K. Travin, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 29, 1638 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  12. V.C. Patel, Journal of Fluid Engineering 120, 434 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Knopp, B. Eisfeld, J.B. Calvo, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 30, 54 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Blocken, T. Stathopoulos, J. Carmeliet, Atmospheric Environment 41, 238 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Jimenez (Ed.), Tech. Rep. AGARD Advisory Report No.345, Working Group 21 of the Fluid Dynamics Pannel (1997), [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Lesieur, O. Métais, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 28, 45 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Monin, A. Obukhov, Trudy Geofiz. Inst. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 24, 163 (1954) [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Jimenez, A. Crespo, E. Migoya, Wind Energy 13, 559 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H.A. Panofsky, J.A. Dutton, Atmospheric Turbulence. Models and Methods for Enfineering Applications. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, 1984) [Google Scholar]
  20. S.B. Pope, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 72, 331 (1975) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Sumner, C. Masson, Boundary-Layer Meteorology 144, 199 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J.G. Brasseur, T. Wei, Physics of Fluids 22, 021303 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.