Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 07003
Number of page(s) 12
Section Critical infrastructure and cascading impacts
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. de Moel H., van Alphen J. and Aerts J.C.J.H. (2009). Flood maps in Europe -methods, availability and use. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9, 289–301 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Euripidou E. and Murray V. (2004). Public health impacts of floods and chemical contamination. Journal of Public Health, 26(4), 376–383 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Munich RE (2005). Weather catastrophes and climate change. Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft. Munich, Germany [Google Scholar]
  4. Nones M. and Pescaroli G. (2016). Implications of cascading effects for the EU Floods Directive. Int. Journal of River Basin Management. in press. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2016.1149074 [Google Scholar]
  5. Klijn F., Samuels P. and Van Os A. (2008). Towards flood risk management in the EU: state of affairs with examples from various European countries. International Journal of River Basin Management, 6(4), 307–321 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kundzewicz Z.W., Mata L.J., Arnell N.W., Döll P., Kabat P., Jimenez B., Miller K.A., Oki T., Sen Z. and Shiklomanox I. A. (2007). Freshwater resources and their management. in Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. edited by Parry M.L., Canziani O.F., Palutikof J.P., van der Linden P.J. and Hanson C.E. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK [Google Scholar]
  7. Milly P.C.D., Wetherald R.T., Dunne K.A. and Delworth T.L. (2002). Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature, 415, 514–517 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tunstall S.M., Johnson C.L., and Penning-Roswell E.C. (2004). Flood Hazard Management in England and Wales: from land drainage to flood risk management. World congress on Natural Disaster Mitigation, New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar]
  9. Parker D.J., Priest S.J., and Tapsell S.M. (2009). Understanding and enhancing the public’s behavioral response to flood warning information. Meteorological Applications, 16(1), 103–114 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pescaroli G. and Magni M. (2015). Flood Warnings in Coastal Areas: How Do Social and Behavioural Patterns Influence Alert Services? Natural Hazards Earth System Science, 15, 703–714 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heintz M.D., Hagemeier-Klose M. and Wagner K. (2012). Towards a Risk Governance Culture in Flood Policy -Findings from the Implementation of the “Floods Directive” in Germany. Water, 4(1), 135–156 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Merz B., Hall J., Disse M. and Schuman A. (2010). Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences, 10(3), 509–527 [Google Scholar]
  13. Batica J. and Gourbesville P. (2014). Flood Resilience Index -methodology And Application. International Conference of Hydroinformatics, paper 433 [Google Scholar]
  14. DKKV (2004). Flood Risk Reduction in Germany – lessons learned from the 2002 disaster in the Elbe region. Deutsches Komitee für Katastrophenvorsorge e.V. (DKKV). Bonn, Germany [Google Scholar]
  15. Roos A. and Van der Geer I. (2008). New approaches for flood risk management in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Flood Defence, 6–8 May 2008, Toronto, Canada [Google Scholar]
  16. Bubeck P., Kreibich H., Penning-Rowsell E.C., Botzen W.J.W., De Moel H. and Klijn F. (2015). Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis. Journal of Flood Risk Management. in press. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.1215 [Google Scholar]
  17. European Union (2007). Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the Assessment and the Management of Flood Risks. Official Journal L288, 6.11.2007. [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Alphen J., Martini F., Loat R., Slomp R. and Passchier R. (2009). Flood Risk Mapping in Europe, experiences and best practices. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2(4), 285–292 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pescaroli G. and Alexander D.E. (2015). A definition of cascading disaster and cascading effects: Going beyond the “toping dominos” metaphor. Planet@Risk, 2(3), 1–4 [Google Scholar]
  20. Müller U. (2013). Implementation of the Flood Risk management Directive in Selected European Countries. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 4(3), 115–125 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nones M. (2015). Implementation of the Floods Directive in selected EU Member States. Water and Environmental Journal, 29(2), 412–418 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Birkmann J., Kienberger S. and Alexander D.E. (2014). Assessment of Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: A European Perspective. Eds. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pescaroli G. and Alexander D.E. (2016). Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters. Natural Hazards, 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2186-3 [Google Scholar]
  24. Alexander D.E. (2000). Confronting Catastrophe. Terra Publishing, Harpenden. Oxford University Press, New York [Google Scholar]
  25. European Commission (2008). Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. Official Journal L 345/75 [Google Scholar]
  26. Burzel A., Hounjet M., Becker B.P.J., Di Pietro A. and Pollino M. (2014). Towards A Decision Support System For Consequence Analysis of Flooding On Critical Infrastructure. International Conference of Hydroinformatics, paper 99. [Google Scholar]
  27. Evers M. and Nyberg L. (2013). Coherence and inconsistency of European instruments for integrated river basin management. International Journal of River Basin Management, 11(2), 139–152 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dráb A. and Říha J. (2010). An approach to the implementation of European Directive 2007/60/EC on flood risk management in the Czech Republic, Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences, 10, 1977–1987 [Google Scholar]
  29. Birkmann J. and Von Teichman K. (2010). Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: key challenges-scales, knowledge, and norms. Sustainability Science, 5(2), 171–184 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Khan F.I. and Abbasi S.A. (2000). Studies on the probabilities and likely impacts of chains of accident (domino effect) in a fertilizer industry. Process Safety Progress, 19(1), 40–56 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. May F. (2007). Cascading Disaster Models in Postburn Flash Flood. in Butler B.W., Cook W. The Fire Environment – Innovations, Management and Policy; Conference Proceedings. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, DC, 446–463 [Google Scholar]
  32. Helbing D. (2013). Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature, 497(7447), 51–59 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gill J.C. and Malamud B.D. (2016). Hazard Interactions and Interaction Networks (Cascades) within Multi-Hazard Methodologies. Earth System Dynamics Discussion. doi:10.5194/esd-2015-94 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hellström T. (2007). Critical infrastructure and systemic vulnerability: towards a planning framework. Safety Science, 45(3), 415–430 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ansell C., Boin A. and Keller A. (2010). Managing Transboundary Crises: Identifying the Building Blocks of an Effective Response System. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 18(4), 195–207 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Labaka L., Hernantes J. and Sarriegi J.M. (2016). A holistic framework for building critical infrastructure resilience. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 103, 21–33 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tockner K., Pusch M., Borchardt D. and Lorang M.S. (2010). Multiple stressors in coupled riverfloodplain ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 55(1), 135–151 [Google Scholar]
  38. Slowik M. (2015). Is history of rivers important in restoration projects? The example of human impact on a lowland river valley (the Obra River, Poland). Geomorphology, 251, 50–63 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. European Union (2000). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2000/60/EC Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy, Official Journal C513, 23.10.2000 [Google Scholar]
  40. OECD (2014). Reviews of Risk Management Policies: Seine Basin, Ile-de-France. Resilience to Major Floods. Main Results and Recommendations [Google Scholar]
  41. EPTB Seine Grands Lacs (2014). Programme d’actions de prévention des inondations de la Seine et de la Marne Franciliennes (PAPI). Synthesis [Google Scholar]
  42. City of York (2015a). Local Flood Risk Management Strategy. Approved by the Cabinet in date 03/03/2015. Available at: http://democracy.york [Google Scholar]
  43. Met Office (2015). December 2015. Daily Weather Summary. Available at [Google Scholar]
  44. City of York (2015b). Flooding in York –Timeline. City of York. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  45. The Guardian (2015). UK floods 2015: York suffers phone and internet outages. Available at [Google Scholar]
  46. Ashton V., Aziz H., Keith S. and Smith T. (2003). Review of EU Flood R&D Projects. Report prepared as a part of the group management project on the M.Sc. Water Resources Technology and Management Course, University of Birmingham, Department of Civil Engineering, Birmingham [Google Scholar]
  47. Kay A.L., Davies H.N., Bell V.A. and Jones R.G. (2009). Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England. Climatic Change, 92(1-2), 41–63 [Google Scholar]
  48. Comune di Messina (2015a). Allerta meteo. Ordinanza del Sindaco n. 215 del 14 ottobre 2015. Available at in Italian [Google Scholar]
  49. La Repubblica (2015). Frana a monte delle condutture, tutta Messina resta senz’acqua. Available at in Italian [Google Scholar]
  50. Comune di Messina (2015b). Chiusura uffici comunali. Determinazione del Segretario Generale n. 467 del 26 ottobre 2015. Available at: in Italian [Google Scholar]
  51. OPCM (2009a). Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 3815/2009 - Emergenza Messina. in Italian [Google Scholar]
  52. OPCM (2009b). Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 3734/2009 - Interventi eventi atmosferici novembre/dicembre 2008. in Italian [Google Scholar]
  53. Comune di Messina (2008). Piano Comunale di Protezione Civile per la Città di Messina. Available at: in Italian [Google Scholar]
  54. Young S., Balluz L. and Myers M.F. (2004). Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: a review. Science of The Total Environment, 322(1/3), 3–20 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Marzo E., Busini V. and Rota R. (2012). Definition of a shortcut methodology for assessing flood-related Na-Tech risk. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 3241–3253 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Shaluf I.M. (2007). An overview on the technological disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management, 16(3), 380–390 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Galderisi A., Ceudech A. and Pistucci M. (2008). A method for na-tech risk assessment as supporting tool for land use planning mitigation strategies. Natural Hazards, 46(2), 221–241 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Cozzani V., Campedel M., Renni E. and Krausmann E. (2010). Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: Analysis of past accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 175(1-3), 501–509 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Krausmann E., Renni E., Campedel M. and Cozzani V. (2011). Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Natural Hazards, 59(1), 285–300 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2015). Major Accident Reporting System (MARS). Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, Major Accident Hazards Bureau. Accessed 16 December 2015. Available at [Google Scholar]
  61. European Commission (1996). Council Directive 1996/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances. Official Journal L10, 14.1.1997 [Google Scholar]
  62. Whitfield A. (2002). COMAH and the Environment: Lessons Learned from Major Accidents 1999– 2000. Process safety and environmental protection, 80(1), 40–46 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Suchara I. and Sucharová J. (2008). Mercury distribution around the Spolana chlor-alkali plant (central Bohemia, Czech Republic) after a catastrophic flood, as revealed by bioindicators. Environmental Pollution, 151(2), 352–361 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Ulbrich U., Brücher T., Fink A.H., Leckebusch G.C., Krüger A. and Pinto J.G. (2003). The central European floods of August 2002: Part 1 – Rainfall periods and flood development. Weather, 58(10), 371–377 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stachel B., Jantzen E., Knoth W., Krüger F., Lepom P., Oetken M., Reincke H., Sawal G., Schwartz R. and Uhlig S. (2005). The Elbe Flood in August 2002 -Organic Contaminants in Sediment Samples Taken After the Flood Event. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 40(2), 265–287 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hudec P. and Luks O. (2004). Flood at Spolana a-s in August 2002. Loss Prevention Bulletin (LPB), Sample papers, LPB180, 36–39 [Google Scholar]
  67. Vácha R., Polácek O. and Horváthová V. (2003). State of contamination of agricultural soils after floods in August 2002. Plant Soil and Environment, 49(7), 307–313 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Met Office (2000). The autumn 2000 rains and floods. Post 151, Post Note, December 2000 [Google Scholar]
  69. Crichton D. (2008). Role of Insurance in Reducing Flood Risk. The Geneva Papers, 33, 117–132 [Google Scholar]
  70. King G., Keohane R. and Verba S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton University Press, Princeton. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.