Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 08002
Number of page(s) 10
Section Vulnerability and societal resilience
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708002
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Godschalk D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, August, pp. 136–143 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Terrin J-J. (sous la direction de) (2014). Villes inondables. Prévention, résilience, adaptation. Parenthèses, 288p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Public Law 110-114-Nov. 8, 2007, 110th Congress, US Government [Google Scholar]
  4. CEPRI (2007), Les PAPI six ans après leur démarrage. Rapport CEPRI, 4p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Leong K. J., Airriess C. A., Li W., Chia-Chen Chen A. C., Keith V. M. (2007). Resilient History and the Rebuilding of a Community: The Vietnamese American Community in New orleans East. The Journal of American History, December, pp 770–779 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction UNISDR (2009). Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. 30p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pizzo B. (2015). Problematizing resilience: Implications for planning theory and practice, Cities, Vol. 43, pp. 133–140 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pimm S. L. (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems, Nature, Vol. 307, pp. 321–326 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Resilience Alliance, http://www.resalliance.org [Google Scholar]
  10. Toubin M., Lhomme S., Diab Y., Serre D., Laganier R. (2012). La résilience urbaine : un nouveau concept opérationnel vecteur de durabilité urbaine ?, Développement durable et territoires, Vol. 3, n°1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lhomme S., Serre D., Diab Y., Laganier R., (2013). Assessing resilience of urban networks : a preliminary step towards more flood resilient cities, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Special Issue: Natural hasard resilient cities, pp. 221–230 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vasu N. (2007). Social resilience in Singapore: reflections from the London bombings. Select Publishing, Singapore, 110p. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cyrulnik B., (1998). Ces enfants qui tiennent le coup. Hommes et perspectives, 120p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Anaut M. (2003). La résilience, Surmonter les traumatismes. Editions Nathan Université, 125p. [Google Scholar]
  15. Poirier C. (2001). La Résilience. Présentation, the Psychologist at the Institut de Psychanalyse de Paris, Pavillon Roland Saucier [Google Scholar]
  16. Lévy J. and Lussault M., (2013). Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés, Belin, 1127p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hutter G., Kuhlicke C., Glade T. and Felgentreef C. (2011). Natural hazards and resilience : exploring institutional and organizational dimensions of social resilience. Natural Hazards, Vol. 60, pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  18. Blesius J-C. (2013). Discours sur la culture du risque, entre approches négative et positive. Vers une éducation aux risques? Géographie et cultures, Vol. 88, pp. 249–265 [Google Scholar]
  19. Labeur C. (2013). Raconter l’inondation: quand les récits de catastrophes se font mémoire du risque. Géocarrefour, Vol. 88, pp. 45–54 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Margalit A. (2006). L’éthique du souvenir. Paris, Climats, 224p. [Google Scholar]
  21. Langumier J. (2005). Genèse du risque et mémoire de la catastrophe: une approche ethnographique des inondations dans les Basses Plaines de l’Aude. Pour mémoire, Comité d’Histoire, n°4, pp. 8–25 [Google Scholar]
  22. Leroy J. (2014). Etude de la viabilité des quartiers dans un contexte post-catastrophe: Exemple du Lower 9th Ward à la Nouvelle-Orléans. Rapport de stage de fin d’étude, Ecole des Ingénieurs de la Ville de Paris, encadré par Amdal J.R, Senior research associate, University of New Orleans et Youssef Diab, professeur l’Université Paris Est, 100 p. [Google Scholar]
  23. Garros-Levasseur E. (2015). Remembering and transmitting flooding experiences through material traces. Workshop Imagining the future of collective memory, Neuchâtel, June 4–5 [Google Scholar]
  24. Slovic P. (2000). The perception of risk. Risk, society, and policy series, Earthscan Publications, 473p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Michel-Guillou E., Lalanne P-A., Krien N. (2015). Hommes et aléas: appréhension des risques côtiers par des usagers et des gestionnaires de communes littorales. Pratiques psychologiques, 21, pp. 35–53 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Billig M. (2006). Is My Home My Castle? Place Attachment, Risk Perception, and Religious Faith. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 248–265 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Coanus T., Duchêne F., Martinais E. (2004). Risque, territoire et longue durée: vers une “société du risque »? Les annales de la recherche urbaine, n°95, Apprivoiser les catastrophes, pp. 19–25 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Theys J. (1987). La société vulnérable. In Fabiani J.-L. and Theys J., La société vulnérable: évaluer et maîtriser les risques, Presses de l’École Normale Supérieure, Paris, pp. 3–36 [Google Scholar]
  29. Cutter S., Barnes L., Berry M., Burton C., Evans E., Tate E. and Webb J. (2008). Community and regional resilience : perspectives from hazards, disasters, and emergency management, CAPRI Research Report 1, Oak Ridge : Community and Regional Institute [Google Scholar]
  30. Cutter S., Barnes L., Berry M., Burton C., Evans E., Tate E. and Webb J. (2008). A placed-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environnement Change, Vol. 18, pp. 598–606 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cutter S., Burton C. and Emrich C. (2010). Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Vol. 7, article 51 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. The Lens (2014). New Orleans’ flood protection system: Stronger than ever, weaker than it was supposed to be. By Bob Marshall, May 15 [Google Scholar]
  33. Walters J. (2015). A guide to Hurricane Katrina and Its Aftermath. Jacobin [Google Scholar]
  34. Los Angeles Times (2005). Trapped in an Arena of Suffering, Sept 01, Scott Gold [Google Scholar]
  35. Amdal J.R. (2013). Urban resilience in post-Katrina/Rita in New Orleans. In Resilience and Urban Risk Management, directed by Serre, Barroca and Laganier, Taylor and Francis Group, London, 179p. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zaninetti J-M. (2013). Adaptation urbaine postcatastrophe: la recomposition territoriale de la Nouvelle Orléans. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, Document 636 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hernandez J. (2012). Résilience contradictoires et résilience toxique dans la Nouvelle-Orléans post-Katrina, in Résiliences urbaines, les villes face aux catastrophes, coordinated by Djament-Tran G. and Reghezza-Zitt M., Le Manuscrit, pp. 243–274 [Google Scholar]
  38. Logan R. L. (2006). The impact of Katrina: Race and Class in Storm Damaged Neighborhood. Spatial Structures in the Social Sciences, Brown University, Working paper [Google Scholar]
  39. The Nation (2015). Why the Lower Ninth Ward looks like the Hurricane just hit. By Gary Rivlin, August 13 [Google Scholar]
  40. The Washington Post (2015). What happened when Brad pitt and his architects came to rebuild New Orleans. By Peter Whoriskey, August 28 [Google Scholar]
  41. The Times Picayunes (2015). Anatomy of a flood: How New Orleans flooded during Hurricane Katrina. By Dan Swenson, NOLA.com, August 12 [Google Scholar]
  42. Seidman K. F. (2013). Coming Home to New Orleans: Neighborhood Rebuilding After Katrina. Oxford University Press, 383p. [Google Scholar]
  43. Poletti R. and Dobbs B. (2001). La résilience, l’art de rebondir. Jouvence, 94p. [Google Scholar]
  44. Rufat S. (2012). Existe-il une « mauvaise » résilience? In Résiliences Urbaines, Les villes face aux catastrophes, Djament-Tran G., Reghezza-Zitt M. (eds), Éditions du Manuscrit, Fronts pionniers, pp. 195–242 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.