EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2016) E3S Web Conf., 7 (2016) 10006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 10006
Number of page(s) 9
Section Hazard and risk mapping
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160710006
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Bryant E. (2005). Natural hazards, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 312 p. [Google Scholar]
  2. McGuire, B. (2004). World atlas of natural hazards, London: Arnold, 120 p., pp. 30. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mráz V. Pohled pojišťoven na problematiku povodní (The insurance view on flood issue). (2000), Pojistný obzor: časopis českého pojišťovnictví, vol. 77, No. 11, pp. 4–5, in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hladný J., Krátká M., and Kašpárek L. (eds.) (2004). August 2002 catastrophic flood in the Czech Republic, Czech Republic : Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, 44 p. [Google Scholar]
  5. MZP CR (2000). Strategie ochrany před povodněmi na území ČR (Czech National Flood Protection Strategy), (online). Available at: http://www.mzp.cz/C1257458002F0DC7/cz/strategie_ochrany_povodne/$FILE/OOV_strategie_povodne_20000419.pdf, (last access: 15th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  6. MZE CR (2010). Koncepce řešení problematiky ochrany před povodněmi v České republice s využitím technických a přírodě blízkých opatření, (The Approach to Flood Protection Problem in the Czech Republic Using Technical and Environmentfriendly Measures), (online). Available at: http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/ministerstvozemedelstvi/koncepce-a-strategie/koncepce-reseniproblematiky-ochrany.html, (last access: 15th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  7. MZP CR (2010). Strategický rámec udržitelného rozvoje České republiky (Strategic Framework for Sustainable Development in the Czech Republic), (online). Available at: http://www.mzp.cz/C125750E003B698B/en/czech_republic_strategy_sd/$FILE/KM-SFSD_CR_EN-20100317.pdf, (last access: 15th January 2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. Klemešová K. (2012). Analýza hydrologických rizik v povodí dolní Bečvy (Analysis of hydrological risks in the lower Bečva river basin), diploma thesis, 99 p., (online). Available at: http://is.muni.cz/th/270049/prif_m/ (last access: 15th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wachinger G., Renn O., Begg CH. and Kuhlicke CH. (2012). The risk perceptions paradox - implications for governance and communication of natural hazards, Risk analysis, vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1049–1065. [Google Scholar]
  10. Řezník T., Horáková B. and Szturc R. (2013). Geographic Information for Command and Control Systems Demonstration of Emergency Support System. In Intelligent Systems for Crisis Management: Geo-information for Disaster Management (GI4DM) 2012: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (eds. Zlatanova S., Dilo A., Peters R., Scholten H.), Berlin: Springer verlag, pp 263–275. [Google Scholar]
  11. Klemešová K. (2010). Povodně a obec Troubky (Floods and the Troubky village), bachelor´s thesis, 93 p., (online). Available at: http://is.muni.cz/th/270049/prif_b/ (last access: 18th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  12. Klemešová K. and Andráško I. (2015). Perception of floods - towards more effective flood management in the Czech Republic. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 199–208. [Google Scholar]
  13. MZE CR and MZP CR (2015). Plán pro zvládání povodňových rizik v povodí Dunaje (Flood risk management plan in the Danube basin ), Praha: MZP CR, MZE CR, 58 p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Begun S., Stive M. J. F. and Hall J. W. (eds.) (2007). Flood risk management in Europe: Innovation in policy and practice, Dordrecht: Springer, 534 p. [Google Scholar]
  15. Whittle R., Medd W., Deeming H., Kashefi E., Mort M., Twigger Ross C., Walker G. and Watson N. (2010). After the Rain – learning the lessons from flood recovery in Hull, final project report for “Flood, Vulnerability and Urban Resilience: a realtime study of local recovery following the floods of June 2007 in Hull”, Lancaster UK: Lancaster University, 1022 p. [Google Scholar]
  16. Penning-Rowsell E. C. and Pardoe J. (2012). Who loses if flood risk is reduces: should we be concerned? Area, vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 152–159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kreibich H., Seifert I., Thieken A. H., Lindquist E., Wagner K. and Merz B. (2011). Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany. Regional environmental change, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 59–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Raaijmakers R., Krywkow J. and Van der Veen A. (2008). Flood risk perceptions and spatial multicriteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 307–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tapsell S. (2010). Socio-psychological dimensions of flood risk management. In Pender G. and Faulkner H. (eds.) Flood Risk Science and Management, pp. 407–429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Moel H., van Alphen J. and Aerts J. C. J. H. (2009). Flood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 289–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zákonč. 254/2001 Sb., o vodách a o změně některých zákonů, ve znění pozdějších předpisů (Vodní zákon) (Water Act 254/2001 col., of 28 June 2001 on Water and Amendments to Some Acts - The Water Act), (online). Available at: http://www.mzp.cz/www/platnalegislativa.nsf/, (last access: 10th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vyhláška Ministerstva životního prostředí č. 236/2002 Sb., o způsobu a rozsahu zpracovávání návrhu a stanovování záplavových území (Decree No. 236/2002 Sb. regarding methods of floodplain documentation processing), (online). Available at: http://www.mzp.cz/www/platnalegislativa.nsf/, (last access: 10th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  23. Povodí Ohře (c2011–2015). Jak se aktualizují návrhy záplavových území? (How are the proposals of floodplains updated?), (online). Available at: http://www.nase-voda.cz/jak-se-aktualizuji-navrhyzaplavovych-uzemi/, (last access: 13th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  24. Špatka J. et al. (2005). Metodika stanovení aktivní zóny záplavového území (The metodology of determining the active floodplain zone ). Praha: DHI Hydroinform a.s. 18 p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Seitlová J. (2013). Závěrečné stanovisko zástupkyně veřejného ochránce práv ve věci záplavových území (The final opinion of the Deputy Ombudsman in the matter of floodplains), (online). Available at: http://www.ochrance.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/STANOVISKA/Zivotni_prostredi/Voda/1524-2012-MPOZZ-priloha.pdf, (last access: 13th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  26. DIBAVOD (c2014). Oddělení GIS a kartografie (Department of GIS and Cartography), (online). Available at: http://www.dibavod.cz/index.php?id=27, (last access: 16th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  27. DIBAVOD (c2014). Prohlížečka záplavových území (Floodplain viewer), (online). Available at: http://www.dibavod.cz/70/prohlizecka-zaplavovychuzemi.html, (last access: 16th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  28. MZP CR (c2016). Povodňový plán České republiky (Flood protection Plan of the Czech Republic), (online). Available at: http://www.dppcr.cz/html_pub/, (last access: 19th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  29. Merz B, Thieken A. H. and Gocht M. (2007). Flood risk mapping at the local scale: concepts and challenges. In Begun S., Stive M. J. F. and Hall J. W. (eds.). Flood risk management in Europe: Innovation in policy and practice, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 231–251. [Google Scholar]
  30. Konečný M., Mulíčková E., Kubíček P. and Jing L. (2011). Geoinformation Support for Flood Management in China and the Czech Republic, Brno: Masaryk University, 119 p. [Google Scholar]
  31. Klemešová K., Kolář M. and Andráško I. (2014). Using GIS in the flood management – flood maps (Troubky, Czech Republic). Geographia Technica, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 44–53. [Google Scholar]
  32. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. (online). Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32007L0060, (last access: 10th January 2016). [Google Scholar]
  33. VUV TGM (2011). Metodiky tvorby map povodňového nebezpečí a povodňových rizik (Methodology of Flood hazard and Flood risk mapping), (online). Available at: http://cds.chmi.cz/dokumentace/Metodika_mapovani_2012-03-13.pdf, (last access: 13th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dráb A. and Říha J. (2010). An approach to the implementation of European Directive 2007/60/EC on flood risk management in the Czech Republic. Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences, vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 1977–1987. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zimmerman M., Pozzi A., and Stoessel F. (2005). Vademecum – Hazard Maps and Related Instruments, The Swiss System and its Application Abroad, Bern: PLANAT, 34 p. [Google Scholar]
  36. SWECO Hydroprojekt and Hydrosoft Veleslavín (c2013, 2014). Centrální datový sklad pro mapy povodňového nebezpečí a povodňových rizik (Central data storage for flood risk and flood hazard maps), (online) Available at: http://cds.chmi.cz/?lang=cs, (last access: 16th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  37. CAP (2009). Tisková zpráva: CAP a Intermap Technologies zveřejňují povodňové mapy (Press Release: CAP and Intermap Technologies published flood insurance maps), (online). Available at: http://www.cap.cz/images/tiskove-zpravy/2009-1-13-11-56.pdf, (last access: 15th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chaloupecký J. and Marvan M. (1997). Dějiny pojišťovnictví v Československ. 3. díl. Dějiny pojišťovnictví v Československu (1945-1992)(The history of insurance in Czechoslovakia), 1st ed., Praha: Česká pojišťovna, 1997, 445 p. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mesršmíd J. (2002). Ohlédnutí za rokem 2002 (Looking back at the year 2002). Pojistný obzor: časopis českého pojišťovnictví, vol. 79, No. 12, pp. 3–4. [Google Scholar]
  40. CAP (2003). Výroční zpráva 2003 (Annual Report 2003), (online). Available at: http://www.cap.cz/www/cap/images/o-nas/vyrocnizpravy/2003.pdf, (last access: 15th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  41. Menzinger I. and Bánovský I. (2002). Frat 1.0: Flood Risk Assessment Tool, (online). Available at: http://media.swissre.com/documents/FRAT10_folder_RZ_5.pdf, (last access: 2nd February 2016). [Google Scholar]
  42. Bým P. (2005). Na povodně mají pojišťovny software (Insurance companies have a software for floods), (online). Available at: http://euro.e15.cz/profit/napovodne-maji-pojistovny-software-873603, (last access: 2nd February 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  43. CAP (2010). Tisková zpráva: Povodňové mapy pro veřejnost zdarma (Flood maps are free of charge to the public), (online). Available at: http://www.cap.cz/images/tiskove-zpravy/2010-5-10-16-24.pdf, (last access: 15th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  44. INTERMAP (2012). Technická specifikace RZ2012 (Technical specifications RZ2012), (online). Available at: https://riskportal.intermap.cz/Intermap.ISF.Web.UI/Views/CS/CAP_Public/Technicka_specifikace_RZ2012_CAP.pdf, (last access: 2nd February 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  45. Česká asociace pojišťoven (Czech insurance association), (online). Available at: http://cap.cz/, (last access: 2 February 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  46. MZP CR (c2008–2015). Povodňové mapy a stanovené záplavové území (Insurance maps and floodplain maps), (online). Available at: http://www.mzp.cz/cz/povodnove_mapy_stanovene_zaplavove_uzemi, (last access: 16th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  47. Buchecker M., Ogasa. D. M. and Maidl E. (2016). How well do the wider public accept integrated flood risk management? An empirical study in two Swiss Alpine valleys. Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 309–317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Bubeck P., Botzen W. J. W. and Aerts J. C. J. H. (2012). A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk analysis, vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 1481–1495. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hagemeier-Klose M. and Wagner K. (2009). Evaluation of flood hazard maps in print and web mapping services as information tools in flood risk communication. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 563–574. [Google Scholar]
  50. CAP (2015). Email communication with Ing. Marcela Machová, Property and Motor Insurance Specialist, Department of Insurance Products and Business. [Google Scholar]
  51. Portál JMK: Mapa životního prostředí Jihomoravského kraje (The map of the environment of the South Moravian Region) (online). Available at: http://gis.kr-jihomoravsky.cz/ozp, (last access: 15th January 2016), in Czech. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bradford R. A., Sullivan J. J. O., Van der Craats I. M., Krywkow J., Rotko P., Aaltonen J., Bonaiuto M., De Domincis S., Waylen K. and Schelfaut K. (2012). Risk perception-issues for flood management in Europe. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 2299–2309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Meyer V., Kuhlicke C., Luther J., Fuchs S., Priest S., Dorner W., Serrhini K., Pardoe J., McCarthy S., Seidel J., Palka G., Unnerstall H., Viavattene C. and Scheuer S. (2012). Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps. Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 1701–1716. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kjellgren S. (2013). Exploring local risk managers’ use of flood hazard maps for risk communication purposes in Baden-Württemberg. Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences, vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 1857–1872. [Google Scholar]
  55. EXCIMAP (2007). Atlas of Flood Maps: Examples from 19 European countries, USA and Japan. (online). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/flood_risk/flood_atlas/, (last access: 2nd February 2016). [Google Scholar]
  56. EXCIMAP (2007). Handbook on good practices for flood mapping in Europe (online). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/flood_risk/flood_atlas/pdf/handbook_goodpractice.pdf, (last access: 2nd February 2016). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.