Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 11001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Risk evaluation and assessment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160711001
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Jongejan, R.B., Maaskant, B. (2015). Quantifying flood risks in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis, 35(2):252–64. [CrossRef]
  2. Hall, J.W., Sayers, P.B., Dawson, R.J. (2005) National-scale assessment of current and future flood risk in England and Wales. Nat. Hazards (36) 1–2 Pp. 147–164, 2005. [CrossRef]
  3. De Bruijn, K.M., Diermanse, F.L.M., Beckers, J.V.M. (2014). An advanced method for flood risk analysis in river deltas, applied to societal flood fatality risk in the Netherlands. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2767–2781. doi:10.5194/nhess-14-2767-2014 [CrossRef]
  4. Vorogushyn, S., Merz, B., Lindenschmidt, K.-E., Apel, H. (2010) A new methodology for flood hazard assessment con-sidering dike breaches. Water Resources Research 46, W08541. [CrossRef]
  5. Olson, K.R., & Morton, L.W. (2012). The effects of 2011 Ohio and Mississippi river valley flooding on Cairo, Illinois, area. J. Soil Water Conserv. 67, 42A–46A. [CrossRef]
  6. Amadio, M. (2012). Flood risk assessment in the Po River basin under a climate change scenario. Msc Thesis, Joint Master’s programme in sustainable development. Ca’ Foscari University & Utrecht University. Accessible through: http://dspace.unive.it/bitstream/handle/10579/1882/825260-76816.pdf?sequence=2
  7. Klerk, W.J. Kok, M., De Bruijn, K.M., Jonkman, S.N., Van Overloop, P.J.A.T.M. (2014). Influence of load interdependencies of flood defences on probabilities and risks at the Bovenrijn/Ijssel area, The Netherlands. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Flood Management, September 2014, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  8. Apel, H., Thieken, A., Merz, B., Blöschl, G. (2004). Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty. NHESS, 4, 295–308, 2004.
  9. Apel, H., Merz, B., Thieken, A.H. (2009). Influence of dike breaches on flood frequency estimation. Computers & Geosciences 35, 907–923, 2009. [CrossRef]
  10. Van Mierlo, M.C.L.M. Vrouwenvelder, A.C.W.M., Calle, E.OF., Vrijling., J.K., Jonkman, S.N., De Bruijn, K.M., Weerts, A.H. (2007). Assessment of floods risk accounting for River System Behaviour, Intl J. River Basin Manage. 5, (2), 93–104. [CrossRef]
  11. Vorogushyn, S., Lindenschmidt, K.-E., Kreibich, H., Apel, H., Merz, B. (2012): Analysis of a detention basin impact on dike failure probabilities and flood risk for a channel-dike-floodplain system along the river Elbe, Germany. - Journal of Hydrology, 436–437, 120–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.006 [CrossRef]
  12. Vrouwenvelder A.C.W.M. et al. (2010). Risk analysis for flood protection systems. Main report, TNO & Deltares, Delft, the Netherlands, 2010.
  13. Deelprogramma Veiligheid. (2014). Technischinhoudelijke uitwerking van eisen aan primaire waterkeringen (DPV 2.2). WVL & Deltares, Nederland (In Dutch).
  14. Diermanse, F.L.M., De Bruijn, K.M. and Beckers, J.: Importance sampling for efficient modelling of hydraulic loads in flood risk analysis. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. DOI 10.1007/s00477-014-0921-4
  15. Hegnauer, M., Kwadijk, J., Klijn, F. (2015). The plausibility of extreme high discharges in the river Rhine. Project 1220042-004, Deltares, Delft. The Netherlands.
  16. Sperna Weiland, F.C., Hegnauer, M., Van den Boogaard, H., Buiteveld, H., Lammersen, R. and Beersma, J. (2016) Implications of CMIP5 derived climate scenarios for discharge extremes of the Rhine, submitted to 4th IAHR Europe Congress, Liege Belgium 27-29 July 2016.
  17. Ververs, M. & Klijn, F. (2004). Werken noodoverloopgebieden? Wat leert ons de overstroming van 1926? Geografie 7 (September 2004): 14–17

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.