EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2016) E3S Web Conf., 7 (2016) 13002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 13002
Number of page(s) 11
Section Non-structural measures and instruments
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160713002
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. HattermannF. F., S. Huang, T. Vetter, KronW., O. Burghoff, B. Merz, A. Bronstert, V. Krysanova, F.-W. Gerstengarbe, P. Werner and Y. Hauf (2012). Flood risk from a holistic perspective – observed changes in Germany. In: Z. W. Kundzewicz (eds.). Changes in flood risk in Europe. CRC Press. 212–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. F. Hattermann, S. Huang, O. Burghoff, W. Willems, H. Österle, BüchnerM. and Z. Kundzewicz (2014). Modelling flood damages under climate change conditions – a case study for Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14(12), 3151–3168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Höppe (2014) Naturkatastrophen der letzten Jahrzehnte. Trends bei Häufigkeit und Schäden, Ausblick in die nahe Zukunft. Natur und Landschaft,89(12), 516–521. [Google Scholar]
  4. KreibichH., P. Bubeck, M. Kunz, H. Mahlke, S. Parolai, B. Khazai, J. Daniell, T. Lakes and K. Schröter (2014). A review of multiple natural hazards and risks in Germany. Natural Hazards, 74(3), 2279–2304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. DKKV (German Committee for Disaster Reduction) (2015): Das Hochwasser im Juni 2013: Bewährungsprobe für das Hochwasserrisikomanagement in Deutschland. DKKV-Schriftenreihe, No. 53, 207 p. (in German). [Google Scholar]
  6. A. H. Thieken, T. Petrow, H. Kreibich and B. Merz (2006). Insurability and Mitigation of Flood Losses in Private Households in Germany. Risk Analysis, 26(2), 383–395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. H. Thieken, M. Müller, H. Kreibich, B. Merz (2005): Flood damage and influencing factors: New insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany. Water Resources Research 41(12): W12430. [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Merz, H. Kreibich, R. Schwarze and A. H. Thieken (2010). Review article “Assessment of economic flood damage”. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,10, 1697–1724. [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Cammerer, A. H. Thieken and J. Lammel (2013). Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,13(11), 3063–3081. [Google Scholar]
  10. V. Meyer, N. Becker, V. Markantonis, R. Schwarze, J. C. J. M. van den Bergh, L. M. Bouwer, P. Bubeck, P. Ciavola, E. Genovese, C. Green, S. Hallegatte, H. Kreibich, Q. Lequeux, I. Logar, E. Papyrakis, C. Pfurtscheller, J. Poussin, V. Przyluski, A. H. Thieken and C. Viavattene (2013). Review article: Assessing the costs of natural hazards - state of the art and knowledge gaps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(5), 1351–1373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Messner, E. Penning-Rowsell, C. Green, V. Meyer, S. Tunstall and A. van der Veen (2007). Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods. FLOODsite-Report, T09-06-01, 176 p. [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Bubeck and H. Kreibich (2011). Natural hazards: direct costs and losses due to the disruption of production processes. CONHAZ Report, WP1, 68 p. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. de Moel and J. C. J. H. Aerts (2011). Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Natural Hazards, 58(1), 407–425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Green, C. Viavattene and P. Thompson (2011). Guidance for assessing flood losses: CONHAZ report, WP6, 86 p. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Jongman, H. Kreibich, H. Apel, J. I. Barredo, P. D. Bates, L. Feyen, A. Gericke, J. Neal, J. C. J. H. Aerts and P. J. Ward (2012). Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 3733–3752. [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Schröter, H. Kreibich, K. Vogel, C. Riggelsen, F. Scherbaum and B. Merz (2014). How useful are complex flood damage models? Water Resources Research, 50(4), 3378–3395. [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Apel, G. T. Aronica, H. Kreibich and A. H. Thieken (2009). Flood risk analyses - how detailed do we need to be? Natural Hazards, 49(1), 79–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Wünsch, U. Herrmann, H. Kreibich and A.H. Thieken (2009). The Role of Disaggregation of Asset Values in Flood Loss Estimation: A Comparison of Different Modeling Approaches at the Mulde River, Germany. Environmental Management,44(3), 524–541. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Elmer, A. H. Thieken, I. Pech and H. Kreibich (2010). Influence of flood frequency on residential building losses. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10, 2145–2159. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wasserhaushaltsgesetz (Federal Water Act)(2009). “Wasserhaushaltsgesetz vom 31. Juli 2009 (BGBl. I S. 2585), das zuletzt durch Artikel 320 der Verordnung vom 31. August 2015 (BGBl. I S. 1474) geändert worden ist (in German). [Google Scholar]
  21. R.J. Dawson, T. Ball, J. Werritty, A. Werritty, J.W. Hall and N. Roche (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of non-structural flood management measures in the Thames Estuary under conditions of socio-economic and environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 21, 628–646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J. K. Poussin, P. Bubeck, J. C. J. H. Aerts and P. J. Ward (2012). Potential of semi-structural and non-structural adaptation strategies to reduce future flood risk: case study for the Meuse. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12(11), 3455–3471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. H. de Moel, M. van Vliet and J. C. J. H. Aerts (2014). Evaluating the effect of flood damagereducing measures: a case study of the unembanked area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, 14(3), 895–908. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Lasage, T. I. E. Veldkamp, H. de Moel, T. C. Van, H. L. Phi, P. Vellinga and J. C. J. H. Aerts (2014). Assessment of the effectiveness of flood adaptation strategies for HCMC. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14(6), 1441–1457. [Google Scholar]
  25. ABI (Association of British Insurers) (2003). Assessment of the Cost and Effect on Future Claims of Installing Flood Damage Resistant Measures, London. [Google Scholar]
  26. Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) (2008). Developing the evidence base for flood resistance and resilience. Joint Defra/EA Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management R&D Programme, FD2607/TR1, 24 p. [Google Scholar]
  27. ICPR (International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine)(2002). Non structural flood plain management: Measures and their effectiveness. 50 p. [Google Scholar]
  28. BMVI (Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure)(2013). Hochwasserschutzfibel – Objektschutz und bauliche Vorsorge. 56 p (in German). [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Kreibich, A. H. Thieken, T. Petrow, M. Müller and B. Merz (2005). Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures - lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 5, 117–126. [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Kreibich and A.H. Thieken (2009). Coping with floods in the city of Dresden, Germany. Natural Hazards, 51, 423–436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Hudson, W. Botzen, H. Kreibich, P. Bubeck and J. Aerts (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures by the application of propensity score matching. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14, 1731–1747. [Google Scholar]
  32. J. K. Poussin, W. J. W. Botzen and J. C. J. H. Aerts (2015). Effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures: Empirical evidence from French flood disasters. Global Environmental Change, 31, 74–84. [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Bubeck, W. J. W. Botzen, H. Kreibich and J. C. J. H. Aerts (2012). Long-term development and effectiveness of private flood mitigation measures: an analysis for the German part of the river Rhine. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 3507–3518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. H. Kreibich, S. Christenberger and R. Schwarze (2011). Economic motivation of house-holds to undertake private precautionary measures against floods. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11, 309–321. [Google Scholar]
  35. H. Kreibich, S. Christenberger and R. Schwarze (2012). Corrigendum to ‘‘Economic motivation of households to undertake private precautionary measures against floods’’ published in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11: 309-321, 2011. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 391–392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. A.H. Thieken, H. Cammerer, C. Dobler, J. Lammel, F. Schöberl (2014). Estimating changes in flood risks and benefits of non-structural adaptation strategies - a case study from Tyrol, Austria. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, online first 31 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  37. B. Büchele, H. Kreibich, A. Kron, A. H. Thieken, J. Ihringer, P. Oberle, B. Merz and F. Nestmann (2006). Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 6, 485–503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A. H. Thieken, A. Olschewski, H. Kreibich, S. Kobsch and B. Merz (2008). Development and evaluation of FLEMOps – a new Flood Loss Estimation MOdel for the private sector. In: D. Proverbs, C. A. Brebbia and E. Penning-Rowsell (eds.). Flood Recovery, Innovation and Response, 315–324. [Google Scholar]
  39. A. H. Thieken, H. Kreibich, M. Müller and B. Merz (2007). Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52(5), 1016–1037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. C. Kuhlicke, C. Begg, M. Beyer, I. Callsen, A. Kunath and N. Löster (2014). Hochwasservorsorge und Schutzgerechtigkeit: Erste Ergebnisse einer Haushaltsbefragung zur Hochwassersituation in Sachsen. UFZ Discussion Papers,15/2014, 39 p. [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Kienzler, I. Pech, H. Kreibich, M. Müller and A. H. Thieken (2015). After the extreme flood in 2002: changes in preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany between 2005 and 2011. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(3), 505–526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. J. W. Hall, P. B. Sayers and R. J. Dawson (2005). National-scale assessment of current and future flood risk in England and Wales. Natural Hazards, 36, 147–164. [Google Scholar]
  43. L. M. Bouwer, P. Bubeck, and J. C. J. H. Aerts (2010). Changes in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area. Global Environmental Change, 20, 463–471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. A. H. te Linde, P. Bubeck, J. E. C. Dekkers, H. de Moel and J. C. J. H. Aerts (2011). Future flood risk estimates along the river Rhine, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11, 459–473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. B. Merz, H. Kreibich, A. H. Thieken and R. Schmidtke (2004). Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 4(1), 153–163. [Google Scholar]
  46. V. Meyer and F. Messner (2005). National Flood Damage Evaluation Methods. A review of applied methods in England, the Netherlands, Czech Republic and Germany. UFZ Discussion Papers, 21/2005, 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  47. H. Kreibich and A. H. Thieken (2008). Assessment of damage caused by high groundwater inundation. Water Resource Research, 44, W09409. [Google Scholar]
  48. I. Seifert, H. Kreibich, B. Merz and A. H. Thieken (2010). Application and validation of FLEMOcs – a flood loss estimation model for the commercial sector. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55(8), 1315–1324. [Google Scholar]
  49. DESTATIS (Statistisches Bundesamt)(2016): Indikatoren - Preise. Available at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/Indikatoren/Konjunkturindikatoren/Preise/bpr110.html, last access 25 February 2016. [Google Scholar]
  50. M. Müller (2000): Die Auswirkungen von Deichbrüchen und Heizöllagerung auf Überschwemmungsschäden bei Wohngebäuden. Versicherungswirtschaft, 2000(10), 693–696 (in German). [Google Scholar]
  51. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2014). Homeowner’s Guide to Retrofitting – Six ways to protect your home from flooding. 3rd ed. US Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.fema.gov/media-librarydata/1404148604102-f210b5e43aba0fb393443fe7ae9cd953/FEMA_P-312.pdf, last access 25 February 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.