Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 20004
Number of page(s) 9
Section Policy appraisal, investment planning and decision making tools
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160720004
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Kind J.M. (2014). Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 7, 103–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Custer R. (2015). Hierarchical Modelling of Flood Risk for Engineering Decision Analysis Technical University of Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tsimopoulou V. (2015). Economic optimisation of flood risk management projects Delft University of Technology. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zwaneveld P. and Verweij G. (2014). Economisch optimale waterveiligheid in het IJsselmeergebied. The Hague. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dupuits E.J.C. and Schweckendiek T. (2015). Flood risk and economically optimal safety targets for coastal flood defense systems. In: Haukaas T, editor. ICASP12: 12th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 12-15 July 2015. Vancouver. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dupuits E.J.C., Schweckendiek T., and Kok M. (2016). [In preparation] Economic Optimization of Coastal Flood Defence Systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vorogushyn S., Merz B., Lindenschmidt K.-E., and Apel H. (2010). A new methodology for flood hazard assessment considering dike breaches. Water Resources Research, 46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vorogushyn S., Lindenschmidt K.-E., Kreibich H., Apel H., and Merz B. (2012). Analysis of a detention basin impact on dike failure probabilities and flood risk for a channel-dike-floodplain system along the river Elbe, Germany. Journal of Hydrology, 436-437, 120–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Courage W., Vrouwenvelder T., van Mierlo T., and Schweckendiek T. (2013). System behaviour in flood risk calculations. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 7, 62–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Bruijn K.M., Diermanse F.L.M., and Beckers J.V.L. (2014). An advanced method for flood risk analysis in river deltas, applied to societal flood fatality risks in the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 1637–1670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Van der Wiel W.D. (2004). Probabilistic risk assessment of a system of dike ring areas Delft University of Technology. [Google Scholar]
  12. Klerk W.J. (2013). Load interdependencies of flood defences Delft University of Technology. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jongejan R., Maaskant B., ter Horst W., Havinga F., Roode N., and Stefess H. (2013). The VNK2-project: a fully probabilistic risk analysis for all major levee systems in the Netherlands. Floods: From Risk to Opportunity (IAHS Publ. 357). IAHS Press, Vol. 2005. pp. 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vrijling J.K. (2013). Multi layer safety. Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis. CRC Press. pp. 37–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vrijling J.K. and van Beurden I.J.C.A. (1990). Sealevel rise: a probabilistic design problem. Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 1160–1171. [Google Scholar]
  16. Eijgenraam C.J.J. (2006). Optimal safety standards for dike-ring areas. The Hague. [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Dantzig D. (1956). Economic Decision Problems for Flood Prevention. Econometrica, 24, 276–287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Diermanse F.L.M., Bruijn K.M., Beckers J.V.L., and Kramer N.L. (2014). Importance sampling for efficient modelling of hydraulic loads in the Rhine-- Meuse delta. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 29, 637–652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kanning W., van Baars S., van Gelder P., and Vrijling J. (2007). Lessons from New Orleans for the design and maintenance of flood defence systems. In: Aven, and Vinnem, editors. Proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference 2007 (ESREL 2007). London: Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 937–942. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zwaneveld P.J. and Verweij G. (2014). Safe Dike Heights at Minimal Costs. The Hague. 40 p. [Google Scholar]
  21. De Bruijn K.M., Diermanse F.L.M., Van der Doef M., and Klijn K. (2016). Hydrodynamic system behaviour: its analysis and implications for flood risk management. FloodRisk2016 conference. Lyon. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.