Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 24002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Ethics, equity and social responsibility
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Johnson, C.L. and S.J. Priest, Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2008. 24(4): pp. 513–525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, C. and N. Pidgeon, From ‘flood defence’ to ‘flood risk management’: exploring governance, responsibility, and blame. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 2011. 29(3): pp. 533–547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Thompson, D.F., Moral responsibility and public officials. American Political Science Review, 1980. 74: pp. 905–916. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doorn, N. and I.R. Van de Poel, Editors’ overview: Moral responsibility in technology and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2012. 18(1): pp. 1–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Van de Poel, I.R., et al., The problem of many hands: Climate change as an example. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2012. 18(1): pp. 49–67. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. OECD, Water Governance in the Netherlands: Fit for the Future? OECD Studies on Water OECD. 2014, Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  7. Doorn, N., Responsibility ascriptions in technology development and engineering: Three perspectives. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2012. 18(1): pp. 69–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peeters, W., et al., Climate Change and Individual Responsibillity: Agency, Moral Disengagement and the Motivational Gap. 2015, London: Palgrave Macmillan. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mostert, E., Who should do what in environmental management? Twelve principles for allocating responsibility. Environmental Science and Policy, 2015. 45: pp. 123–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Doorn, N., The blind spot in risk ethics: Managing natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 2015. 35(3): pp. 354–360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition ed. 1999[1971], Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jongejan, R.B., Jonkman, S.N., and J.K. Vrijling, An overview and discussion of methods for risk evaluation, in Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety, Vols 1-3-Vol 1: Specialisation Topics; Vol Thematic Topics; Vol 3: Applications Topics, T. Aven and J.E. Vinnem, Editors. 2007. p. 1391–1398. [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller, D., Justice for Earthlings. Essays in Political Philosophy. 2013, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller, D., Distributing responsibilities. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 2001. 9(4): pp. 453–471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tennekes, J., et al., Out of the Comfort Zone: Institutional Context and the Scope for Legitimate Climate Adaptation Policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 2014. 16(2): pp. 241–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Barron, S., et al., A Climate Change Adaptation Planning Process for Low-Lying, Communities Vulnerable to Sea Level Rise. Sustainability, 2012. 4(9): pp. 2176–2208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lynch, A.H. and R.D. Brunner, Context and climate change: An integrated assessment for Barrow, Alaska. Climatic Change, 2007. 82(1-2): pp. 93–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nye, M., Tapsell, S., and C. Twigger-Ross, New social directions in UK flood risk management: moving towards flood risk citizenship? Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2011. 4(4): pp. 288–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Olsson, E.K., Crisis Communication in Public Organisations: Dimensions of Crisis Communication Revisited. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2014. 22(2): pp. 113–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stevens, M.R. and S. Hanschka, Multilevel Governance of Flood Hazards: Municipal Flood Bylaws in British Columbia, Canada. Natural Hazards Review, 2014. 15(1): pp. 74–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Harvatt, J., Petts, J., and J. Chilvers, Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: flooding and sea-level rise comparisons. Journal of Risk Research, 2011. 14(1): pp. 63–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Keogh, D.U., et al., Resilience, vulnerability and adaptive capacity of an inland rural town prone to flooding: a climate change adaptation case study of Charleville, Queensland, Australia. Natural Hazards, 2011. 59(2): pp. 699–723. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lawrence, J., Quade, D., and J. Becker, Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk. Natural Hazards, 2014. 74(3): pp. 1773–1794. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Neuvel, J.M.M. and A. Van den Brink, Flood risk management in Dutch local spatial planning practices. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2009. 52(7): pp. 865–880. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Niebling, W., et al., Challenge and response in the Mississippi River Basin. Water Policy, 2014. 16: pp. 87–116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Doorn, N., Allocating responsibility for environmental risks: A comparative analysis of examples from water governance. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fillmore, E.P., et al., After the Waters Receded: A Qualitative Study of University Official’s Disaster Experiences During the Great Iowa Flood of 2008. Journal of Community Health, 2011. 36(2): pp. 307–315. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Haque, C.E., Risk assessment, emergency preparedness and response to hazards: The case of the 1997 Red River Valley flood, Canada. Natural Hazards, 2000. 21(2-3): pp. 225–245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Crisp, R., Equality, Priority, and Compassion. Ethics, 2003. 113(4): pp. 745–763. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lumbroso, D., Stone, K., and F. Vinet, An assessment of flood emergency plans in England and Wales, France and the Netherlands. Natural Hazards, 2011. 58(1): pp. 341–363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Crichton, D., UK and global insurance responses to flood hazard. Water International, 2002. 27(1): pp. 119–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mees, H.L.P., Driessen, P.P.J., and H.A.C. Runhaar, Legitimate adaptive flood risk governance beyond the dikes: the cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam. Regional Environmental Change, 2014. 14(2): pp. 671–682. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dahlstrom, K., Skea, J., and W.R. Stahel, Innovation, insurability and sustainable development: Sharing risk management between insurers and the state. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 2003. 28(3): pp. 394–412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Blanchard-Boehm, R.D., Berry, K.A., and P.S. Showalter, Should flood insurance be mandatory? Insights in the wake of the 1997 New Year’s Day flood in Reno-Sparks, Nevada. Applied Geography, 2001. 21(3): pp. 199–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Keskitalo, E.C.H., Vulturius, G., and P. Scholten, Adaptation to climate change in the insurance sector: examples from the UK, Germany and the Netherlands. Natural Hazards, 2014. 71(1): pp. 315–334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Keessen, A.M., et al., The Concept of Resilience from a Normative Perspective: Examples from Dutch Adaptation Strategies. Ecology and Society, 2013. 18(2): pp. 12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Adger, W.N., et al., Changing social contracts in climate-change adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 2013. 3(4): pp. 330–333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tas, M., et al., Flood disaster vulnerability in informal settlements in Bursa, Turkey. Environment and Urbanization, 2013. 25(2): pp. 443–463. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kreibich, H., Do perceptions of climate change influence precautionary measures? International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 2011. 3(2): pp. 189–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Terpstra, T. and J.M. Gutteling, Households’ perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2008. 24(4): pp. 555–565. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Soane, E., et al., Flood perception and mitigation: the role of severity, agency, and experience in the purchase of flood protection, and the communication of flood information. Environment and Planning A, 2010. 42(12): pp. 3023–3038. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schad, I., et al., Why do people not learn from flood disasters? Evidence from Vietnam’s northwestern mountains. Natural Hazards, 2012. 62(2): pp. 221–241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Burton, M., Marsh, S., and J. Patterson, Community attitudes towards water management in the Moore Catchment, Western Australia. Agricultural Systems, 2007. 92(1-3): pp. 157–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Bichard, E. and A. Kazmierczak, Are homeowners willing to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change? Climatic Change, 2012. 112(3-4): pp. 633–654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Mullins, A. and R. Soetanto, Ethnic differences in perceptions of social responsibility Informing risk communication strategies for enhancing community resilience to flooding. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2013. 22(2): pp. 119–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Thaler, T. and S. Priest, Partnership funding in flood risk management: new localism debate and policy in England. Area, 2014. 46(4): pp. 418–425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Douglas, I., et al., Unjust waters: climate change, flooding and the urban poor in Africa. Environment and Urbanization, 2008. 20(1): pp. 187–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Karanikola, P., et al., Facing and managing natural disasters in the Sporades islands, Greece. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2014. 14(4): pp. 995–1005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Greiving, S., et al., Linking the actors and policies throughout the disaster management cycle by “Agreement on Objectives”–a new output-oriented management approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2012. 12(4): pp. 1085–1107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Williams, K., et al., Retrofitting England’s suburbs to adapt to climate change. Building Research and Information, 2013. 41(5): pp. 517–531. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.